Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to Zipkin Reporter 3.4.0 #40343

Conversation

codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

@codefromthecrypt codefromthecrypt commented Apr 13, 2024

I'm only raising this manually for documentation:

Spring currently configures the Brave AsyncSpanHandler with default settings. These defaults included 3 thresholds to flush a backlog, whichever comes first.

The estimated size in bytes threshold (queuedMaxBytes=1pct memory) has been disabled by default and deprecated, due to appearing pinned when virtual threads are in use (-Djdk.tracePinnedThreads). This is effectively no impact due to the other two flush thresholds (queuedMaxSpans=10000,messageTimeout=1s), most importantly that in the default case (such as spring-boot not setting anything), you are much more likely to hit 1s timeout prior to 1pct of memory of 10k spans.

See https://github.com/openzipkin/zipkin-reporter-java/releases/tag/3.4.0 for more

Trivia time

OpenTelemetry's defaults are also in use in BatchSpanProcessorBuilder. There is no queuedMaxBytes analogue in their setup (in hindsight a good thing probably).

  • otel maxQueueSize=2048 vs zipkin-reporter queuedMaxSpans=10000
  • otel scheduleDelay=5s vs zipkin-reporter messageTimeout=1s

My unsolicited 2p is that the maxQueueSize=2048 while arbitrary is better than the queuedMaxSpans=10000 in zipkin-reporter.. I thought it was 10 year old from original brave, but that was 500 🤷. I raised this issue as 2048 is good, even if maybe smaller could be better.

scheduleDelay=5s might not be a great default though. I do remember changing zipkin-reporter to messageTimeout=1s, as beginning devs are impatient and wondered what was wrong prior to 5s :p

Signed-off-by: Adrian Cole <adrian@tetrate.io>
@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Apr 13, 2024
@wilkinsona wilkinsona added type: dependency-upgrade A dependency upgrade and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Apr 15, 2024
@wilkinsona wilkinsona added this to the 3.3.x milestone Apr 15, 2024
@wilkinsona wilkinsona self-assigned this Apr 15, 2024
@wilkinsona wilkinsona modified the milestones: 3.3.x, 3.x Apr 15, 2024
@wilkinsona wilkinsona removed their assignment Apr 15, 2024
@wilkinsona wilkinsona added the status: on-hold We can't start working on this issue yet label Apr 15, 2024
@wilkinsona
Copy link
Member

This may have to wait for Boot 3.4 depending on whether the observability team want to upgrade to a new minor post RC1.

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor Author

hah maybe I over-explained and doomed it ;)

@wilkinsona wilkinsona removed the status: on-hold We can't start working on this issue yet label Apr 16, 2024
@wilkinsona wilkinsona modified the milestones: 3.x, 3.3.x Apr 16, 2024
@wilkinsona
Copy link
Member

The observability team have merged the upgrades on their side. We're good to go here.

@wilkinsona wilkinsona modified the milestones: 3.3.x, 3.3.0-RC1 Apr 16, 2024
wilkinsona pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2024
Signed-off-by: Adrian Cole <adrian@tetrate.io>

See gh-40343
@codefromthecrypt codefromthecrypt deleted the zipkin-reporter-3.4.0 branch April 16, 2024 16:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: dependency-upgrade A dependency upgrade
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants