Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prefix Compression feature addition to SAI #2045

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nadershinouda
Copy link

This pull requests adds a new feature, prefix compression, to the SAI repository. Prefix Compression allows mapping an IP prefix/mask to a bincode (Binary Code). These prefix/bincode mapping can be grouped together to form prefix compression table. Tables can have both IPV4 and IPV6 entries.

This pull request also adds extending ACL spec to add support for bincode field matching. Bincode is part of prefix compression, where an IP prefix is mapped to Bincode.

Files changed:
SAI-Proposal-ACL-Bincode.md -- ACL extension documentation. This extension allows ACL to do lookups based on a bincode

SAI-Proposal-Prefix-Compression.md -- Prefix Compression documentation.

sah.h -- Addition of a new SAI API (prefix compression)

saiacl.h -- Adding extenstions to SAI ACL to support Bincode lookups

saiobject.h -- Adding a new entry type. Prefix compression Entry is the entry used to add a new prefix/bincode mapping to a prefix compression table

saiprefixcompression.h -- The SAI header file that defines Prefix Compression

saitypes.h -- Addition of new types to support prefix compression feature. Table and entry types

acronyms.txt -- Adding a defination for BINCODE

@tjchadaga
Copy link
Collaborator

@nadershinouda - please look into the metadata check failure. Adding @kcudnik

@nadershinouda
Copy link
Author

@nadershinouda - please look into the metadata check failure. Adding @kcudnik

I had this passing but there was an update in master that I picked up, which is causing this failure. It looks because how I merged the updates:

This is the error I see:
WARNING: Both enums have the same value SAI_API_ICMP_ECHO and SAI_API_PREFIX_COMPRESSION = 0x00000052
WARNING: Both enums have the same value SAI_OBJECT_TYPE_ICMP_ECHO_SESSION and SAI_OBJECT_TYPE_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_TABLE = 0x00000111
processing commit 5eaebb9
ERROR: check ! SAI_API_PREFIX_COMPRESSION value is 0x00000053, but on was 0x00000052 on commit 1ee867c
ERROR: check ! SAI_OBJECT_TYPE_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_TABLE value is 0x00000112, but on was 0x00000111 on commit 1ee867c
ERROR: check ! SAI_OBJECT_TYPE_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_ENTRY value is 0x00000113, but on was 0x00000112 on commit 1ee867c
processing commit 12c952e
ERROR: please correct all 3 error(s) and all 2 warnings before continue
make: *** [Makefile:90: all] Error 1

So yes it was originally the SAI_API value was 52, but a commit went in that made me go and update my code to be 53. The same with SAI_OBJECT. What I have now is correct.

@kcudnik
Copy link
Collaborator

kcudnik commented Jul 19, 2024

You need to squash changes and force push instead to merge

@nadershinouda
Copy link
Author

You need to squash changes and force push instead to merge

@kcudnik, how do I do that now that I already merged the changes? Is there an easy way to do that or do I need to revert the changes, then do as you suggested?

@kcudnik
Copy link
Collaborator

kcudnik commented Jul 19, 2024

You can rebase locally and then force push to this branch

@nadershinouda
Copy link
Author

You can rebase locally and then force push to this branch

thank you

* @flags MANDATORY_ON_CREATE | CREATE_AND_SET
*/
SAI_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_ENTRY_ATTR_BINCODE = SAI_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_ENTRY_ATTR_START,

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should have an attribute to let user specify the priority of the prefix compression entry, say

SAI_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_ENTRY_ATTR_PRIORITY

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A priority does not apply in this feature. the concept of this feature is having a longest prefix entry added. The prefix table that is created is based on the longest prefix match. When creating this table if it is designed with the concept of longest prefix entries then that longest prefix would always match.

We usually need a priority when we deal with TCAM, if a vendor plans to implement this using TCAM then this feature does not add value and ACLs could be used instead.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the discussion, the idea was that PREFIX compression is generic, and that ACL table is one type of consumer of the compressed metadata.  So, the assumption is more objects will be using the SAI_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_ENTRY_ATTR_META and it could be different from ACL meta.

We should add the PRIORITY attribute, and LPM based implementations should return NOT_SUPPORTED in the sai_capability_query() for this attribute. I don't see why we should not keep it generic.

Copy link
Author

@nadershinouda nadershinouda Sep 22, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes this feature is generic but generic with the use of LPM capabilities to optimize the correlation between a LPM address and a meta value. The entries are a LPM entry. Can you give a situation where you would want a more specific entry to take place over a longest prefix entry? And why would we do that?

If the intention of the feature is not to use LPM then you could use ACLs instead to match on a specific set of entries with a specific priority. This feature is really intended to allow the consolidation of addresses within a single LPM address. Any other feature that plans to use these tables would be a feature that would benefit from a LPM match and not an ACL style match

* @type sai_uint32_t
* @flags MANDATORY_ON_CREATE | CREATE_AND_SET
*/
SAI_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_ENTRY_ATTR_BINCODE = SAI_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_ENTRY_ATTR_START,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be better to use META instead of BINCODE to align with other existing SAI attributes.
SAI_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_ENTRY_ATTR_USER_META

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't mind changing this to META, the reason I used BINCODE because it would be a unique name and won't get confused of the meta in ACL. I don't mind discussing this and if this is a strong ask, then I can change it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

BINCODE is NOT aligning to the terms already used in SAI. Today SAI already uses META for the different qualifiers (route, neighbor, FDB etc) that can be matched in ACL and disambiguates them well. For e.g., SAI_ACL_ENTRY_ATTR_FIELD_SRC_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_META clearly disambiguates it from other META that can be matched in the ACL table.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have no problem with that, I can change all BINCODE to META in this PR. Thank you for pointing that out, that is a good point. I will try to have the changes done in the next two days

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I pushed a change to replace BINCODE with META. Let me know if I can resolve this comment

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rck-innovium can you please resolve this if you are ok with the changes I pushed up

* @type sai_uint32_t
* @flags MANDATORY_ON_CREATE | CREATE_AND_SET
*/
SAI_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_TABLE_ATTR_DEFAULT_ENTRY_BINCODE,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can't this be modelled by creating a prefix entry with a prefix length of 0?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This attribute allows the user to specific what Bincode they want to associate with the default entry which is a pefix/mask of zero. The default BINCODE value does not have to be zero just the prefix/mask value.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Per discussion today will make changes as requested. I will remove this attribute

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rck-innovium I removed the default entry attribute, please close if you are ok with the changes

SAI_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_TABLE_ATTR_DEFAULT_ENTRY_BINCODE,

/**
* @brief End of attributes
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need the below two attributes:

  1. SAI_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_TABLE_ATTR_TYPE to distinguish between Source IP and Destination IP address
  2. SAI_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_TABLE_ATTR_ACL_STAGE of type sai_acl_stage_t

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the comment below:

  1. We should not have indicate an attribute for source ip or destination IP. From creating the actual prefix tables, they should not be labeled on creation. The user can give them a unique label. The user can decide to mix source/destination values. In ACL the distinction is made because at that point we would need to know if we are matching on source address/destination. However, during table creation there is no value to add that distinction.

I think it is important to seperate the feature Prefix compression from other features that use it. As a prefix compression feature, the main purpose of it is to create tables of prefixes based on longest prefix match. There are no rules on how you create these tables. The issue comes in which feature uses these tables. If we are using these tables with ACL, then ACL would need to know which one is Source IP/DST IP and stage. ACL as a feature has these requirements. Another feature in the future that might use prefix tables, might not care.

  1. There could be value to this, currently when you apply a table to ACL you would indicate the stage, however, I am open to discussing this next time we can bring up this topic in a meeting.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As discussed in meeting today:

  1. Will wait to see if @rck-innovium has a use case that will require this
  2. Will add the stage to the table

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rck-innovium I added stage to table creation (ingress/egress), please close if you are ok with the changes

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am ok with using a new sai_prefix_compression_stage_t instead of sai_acl_stage_t. Prefix compression is generic and can be used by features other than ACL.

I still believe we need SAI_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_TABLE_ATTR_TYPE with values Source, Destination and Both. This lets the SAI application query the enum capability and use accordingly.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a use case in your mind that would require this? since the feature that would be using prefix compression would indicate which table type it would expect. it would be up to the user to pass in the correct information.

I don't mind adding this as a topic that we need to revisit and discuss

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Simple use-case is when the grouping of IP addresses is different for Source IP vs Dest IP. A quick example below where DIP grouping is 10.1.X.X, and SIP grouping is different for 10.1.1.X from 10.1.2.X.

SIP       DIP       L4-Dst-Port Syn   Action
*         10.1.X.X   80           True Permit
*         10.1.X.X   90           True Permit
*         10.1.X.X   *           True Drop  
10.1.1.X   100.X.X.X 80           True Allow  
10.1.1.X   100.X.X.X 90           True Allow  
10.1.2.X   200.X.X.X 80           True Allow  
10.1.2.X   200.X.X.X 90           True Allow  
 

There are multiple possible implementations for assigning the meta-data. In one implementation, the hardware uses the same packet metadata bits to store both the Source IP metadata and the Dest IP metadata. In another implementation, the hardware can use separate set of metadata bits to store the Source IP metadata, and another set of bits for the Dest IP metadata.

Having a SAI_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_TABLE_ATTR_TYPE allows users to identify the supported type(s) using SAI enum capability query.

Copy link
Author

@nadershinouda nadershinouda Aug 27, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would this work:

create prefix compression table

  • add label SIP
  • direction ingress

Create entry for table SIP

  • Add entry 10.1.1.0/24 --> meta value 10
  • Add entry 10.1.2.0/24 --> meta value 20

Create Prefix compression table

  • Add label DIP
  • Add direction Ingress

Add entries to table called DIP

  • Entry: 10.1.0.0/16 --> meta 30
  • Entry: 100.0.0.0/8 --> meta 40
  • Entry: 200.0.0.0/8 --> meata 50

Create ACL TABLE

  • Table Attribute: SAI_ACL_TABLE_ATTR_SRC_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_TABLE = SIP Table
  • Table Attribue: SAI_ACL_TABLE_ATTR_DST_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_TABLE = DIP Table
  • Field support: SAI_ACL_TABLE_ATTR_FIELD_SRC_PREFIX_BINCODE
  • Field support: SAI_ACL_TABLE_ATTR_FIELD_DST_PREFIX_BINCODE
  • Add entry match on SAI_ACL_ENTRY_ATTR_FIELD_SRC_PREFIX_BINCODE = 10 (Add action of forward)
  • Add entry match on SAI_ACL_ENTRY_ATTR_FIELD_DST_PREFIX_BINCODE = 30 (Add action of drop)

When adding the ACL entries if you don't specify a priority then it is up to the vendor on how it is implemented. If you wanted to guarantee that the drop happens before the forward then I would add a higher priority on the drop rule.

I also want to add two points:

  1. When creating the Prefix Table we are using LPM so if multiple entries with the same subnet will be treated the same. In the rule you gave above for SIP you would probably want to add only one entry which is 10.1.x.x/16 and the same for the DST.
  2. in ACL these are treated differently we are not matching on both SRC and DST in a single entry. you are only matching on a source address or destination LPM address in a single entry

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rck-innovium / @helloanandhi I added a table type to table attribute. I believe this meets all the changes that were requested. Can you please let me know if you have any other requests, if not can you please approve

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There need to be is_source flag on this attribute

/**
* @brief SRC BINCODE
*
* @type sai_acl_field_data_t sai_uint32_t
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To make reference counting easier, will it be better to model this as: * @type sai_acl_field_data_t sai_object_id_t of type sai_prefix_compression_entry

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this needs to be an entry, this is a bincode(META) value that we are sending in to ACL to match on. A prefix compression entry is the actual key that would be used. We want to match on the result of the key. So we should match on either BINCODE or META if we decide to go with that name.

The reason we are not passing in the entry structure here, because the BINCODE or META is not part of that entry. This is similar to sairoute.cpp. in SAI route we have a route entry and the result of that entry is the next hop.

if this is still confusing we can discuss it next time we have a meeting about this or let me know and I can try to give a better explanation.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rck-innovium Can you please resolve this since we are not going to make this change as discussed in today's meeting

inc/saiacl.h Outdated
* @flags CREATE_AND_SET
* @default disabled
*/
SAI_ACL_ENTRY_ATTR_FIELD_SRC_PREFIX_BINCODE = SAI_ACL_ENTRY_ATTR_FIELD_START + 0x160,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please rename to SAI_ACL_ENTRY_ATTR_FIELD_SRC_PREFIX_META

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I pushed a change to replace BINCODE with META. Let me know if I can resolve this comment

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rck-innovium Can you please close this, based on my latest commit of switch BINCODE to META

sai_entries_attribute_list,
SAI_BULK_OP_ERROR_MODE_STOP_ON_ERROR,
bulk_status);

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please consider including the ACL table and ACL entry usage of the prefix table and prefix entry respectively.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I created a separate document in ACL on ACL using this feature. However, this feature standalone does not depend on ACL. For that reason we should not be listing an example of it in this part of the documenations.

I want prefix compression to be though off as a separate feature than ACL. This is a standalone feature that other features can use. In this case I am using it with ACL, in the future there might be another use of it with another feature.

please refer to [doc/ACL/SAI-Proposal-ACL-Bincode.md]

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rck-innovium, I updated the documentation. I combined both in a single document. Please let me know if this meets your request and resolve if it does


## 1.0 Introduction ##

This spec adds Prefix Compression. Prefix Compression allows mapping an IP prefix/mask to a bincode. These prefix/bincode mapping can be grouped together to form prefix compression table. Tables can have both IPV4 and IPV6 entries.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider modelling this as a generic specialized table, to assign meta data (aka bincode). This table should have stage and other qualification parameters (like prefix, SIP, DIP etc in this case) as an attribute. Depending on these attributes the generic table entries needs to be configured.
This provides means to extension of the hardware based tables to be extended to other packet parameters if needed in future.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The point of prefix compression is to create a key/value lookup based on longest prefix match. I am not sure what you mean but adding other qualification params. The entry is the prefix which is always the longest prefix and the table has to be created with that in mind. The result of the lookup is a unique code. In this case I am calling bincode but can discuss about changing it to META if needed based on other comments from the PR.

In terms of stage, i would like to discuss that in the next meeting where I have an opening. I am open to that, if we feel there is a benefit. As a standalone feature the stage gets added with ACL when we apply it to ACL, ACL would indicate which stage it is using that table. But again I am open to adding a stage to it

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rck-innovium, I updated the documentation. I combined both in a single document. Please let me know if this meets your request and resolve if it does

* @flags CREATE_AND_SET
* @default disabled
*/
SAI_ACL_ENTRY_ATTR_FIELD_DST_PREFIX_BINCODE,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACL qualification in your case can be either or DST_PREFIX_BINCODE or SRC_PREFIX_BINCODE or can both be qualified simultaneously ? If former is true a generic name like META_DATA should suffice.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rck-innovium, I updated the documentation. I combined both in a single document. Please let me know if this meets your request and resolve if it does

Prefix Compression tables can be used in features such as ACL to match on a specific bincode. This allows additional functionality to ACL or any feature that can take advantage of such groupings.

## 1.1.0 Function Requirement of Prefix Compression
- Enable the creation of a prefix compresison table as a SAI object

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SAI infra already has META data assignment in multiple hardware entity like FDB, ROUTE entry etc, Do review them and see if you can add an additional attribute to provide a hint to program the prefix compression table instead. This would minimize the changes in your SAI modelling.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I looked at the specs and we should not be touching ROUTE because it will affect the forwarding path. This is unique because it allows the user to create a table based on longest prefix and use that output in other features for lookup. In this case I am using it with ACL but in the future there could be another feature that benefit from this.

I do agree any time we can minimize SAI changes it would be great, but this is a unique use case and it will add new functionality to SAI. In this case it will add functionality to ACL but again in the future we might find another feature to use this.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rck-innovium, I updated the documentation. I combined both in a single document. Please let me know if this meets your request and resolve if it does

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I still don't understand the explanation why we can't reuse existing ROUTE Meta data.

Today one can assign a META data to any route/FDB/.. entry and it won't affect forwarding path. Later this metadata can be used in other features for additional lookup.

Why proposed feature is different?
What functionality SAI will miss if it will continue to be modeled as a META data in ROUTE entry?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ilyav11 

  1. SAI_ROUTE_ENTRY_ATTR_META_DATA cannot be assigned based on Source IP address. Similarly, FDB metadata cannot be assigned based on the Source MAC address.
  2. For a given packet, a single route entry is matched based on LPM. So, we cannot have separate route entries for forwarding and meta-data.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you plz elaborate about (2)?
Do you mean that this table:

  • is not used for forwarding, but only to match on pattern that is e.g. SIP/DIP and set meta data - similar to ACL?
  • How match in this table done?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ilyav11

  • No it is not used for forwarding but a feature that would need to do a lookup based on a LPM. You can do this in ACL today but it will require lots of entries. This allows a customer lets say has a finance pool of addresses, HR pool of addresses and printers pool of addresses. You can use an LPM address for finance, one for HR and one for Printers as an example to represent each department. If you are using ACL then you can easily decide with meta value can access other meta values. Each can be done in a single entry

  • This table can be done in HW or SW depending on how the vendor supports. This table would be beneficial for any feature that could take advantage of this LPM mapping to a meta value

We are having a meeting tomorrow to discuss this. Please me know if you want to be included. I can have @tjchadaga add you to the meeting.

/**
* @brief IP Prefix Destination
*/
sai_ip_prefix_t prefix;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

VRF is not being considered here. Is this intentional ?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. Prefix Compression is a table of longest prefix match. The entries in the table should indicate the long prefix which are mapped to a unique value. This should not be confused with sairoute.cpp or such features. This has to standalone outside the forwarding table in order not to affect the forwarding path.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@helloanandhi, do you still want to discuss this after the discussion we had about this feature on 8/8/2024 meeting?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nadershinouda, these bincodes are applied only to routed packets or also to layer 2 bridged packets ?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@helloanandhi This is only dealing with L3 routed packets. The table entries are prefix/mask of addresses that get mapped to a meta (bincode) value. The idea is to add longest prefix addresses as entries to this table, that get mapped to this meta value. Packets would need to have either IPV4 address or IPV6 address for ACL to be able to match on the meta value

If this is not clear I don't mind adding it to the list of things that we need to discuss.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@helloanandhi can I resolve this conversation?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the question is not whether the packet is IP or non-IP, rather more on the forwarding operation. Let us say, the switch receives an IP packet with DIP as 10.1.1.3 on a VLAN. The DMAC of the packet does not match the router's MAC and the packet will get bridged.
Now a prefix-compression entry for 10.1.1.x to assign meta-data X should still apply for this packet and meta-data X should be associated with the bridged packet. Is this true?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the packet would be dropped before it reaches your ACL, in that case the packet will not be affected. If the packet reaches the ACL for any reason, prefix compression only applies to IPV4/IPV6 rules, so it would not apply to this packet.

I can request for time next week for us to discuss this if needed. Might be easier over a meeting than on this review

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Nader,

Can you please explicitly clarify whether the below statements are true. 

"Prefix compression applies to a packet with IP header irrespective of whether the packet undergoes L2 forwarding or L3 forwarding. For e.g., a packet with IP header that undergoes bridging operation, will still get the metadata assigned by the prefix compression table".

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure if I understand the question but I will attempt to answer it in the terms of ACL:

if you send the following packet:

ETHERNET|VLAN-TAG|IP|

Create a prefix compression table that includes longest prefix match of the IP of the packet. Create an ACL match on that meta value. Then yes it would match.

What type of forwarding (L2/L3) you do does not affect the Prefix compression table. it is based on the feature that will be using that table

@@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
# Prefix Compression #
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please consider merging both the documents. One doc explains how the meta-data is set, and the other doc explains how it is used.  Each doc is incomplete on its own.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The reason I made two documents because Prefix Compression should be a standalone feature. In this case I am using the feature for ACL and added extensions in ACL.

The first document explains how Prefix Compression works as a feature. The feature allows adding entries of longest prefix and mapping those to a unique META value.

The second document is an ACL specific document that explains how ACL would use that feature. In that document i do give a full example of creating a table/entry, and applying it to ACL

I want prefix compression not to be though of as an extension to ACL. It is a separate feature that ACL uses. Similar to other features that ACL uses like mirroring or sample packet. Sample packet stand alone is a feature but it can be used with ACL. Sample packet has its own documentation that is not associated with ACL.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rck-innovium, I updated the documentation. I combined both in a single document. Please let me know if this meets your request and resolve if it does

Signed-off-by: nshinoud <nshinoud@cisco.com>

Change BINCODE to META - PR change request

Signed-off-by: nshinoud <nshinoud@cisco.com>

Additional changes based on requests from git review
- Removed default meta attribute
- Added stage for table creation
- updated docs

Signed-off-by: nshinoud <nshinoud@cisco.com>

Fix typo: Changes SAI_ACL_TABLE_ATTR_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_STAGE to SAI_TABLE_ATTR_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_STAGE

Signed-off-by: nshinoud <nshinoud@cisco.com>

Fix metadata script error

Signed-off-by: nshinoud <nshinoud@cisco.com>

Another attempt to fix metadata issue. For some reason this passes on my local build

Signed-off-by: nshinoud <nshinoud@cisco.com>

Add support for Prefix Compression Table type: SRC, DST, BOTH

Signed-off-by: nshinoud <nshinoud@cisco.com>

Minor fix (change bincode to meta)

Signed-off-by: nshinoud <nshinoud@cisco.com>

Update comment

Signed-off-by: nshinoud <nshinoud@cisco.com>
@nadershinouda
Copy link
Author

@rck-innovium and @helloanandhi, I made all the changes that you asked for. Can you please look over my latest changes and approve if you are don't have anymore comments.

@rlhui rlhui added the reviewed PR is discussed in SAI Meeting label Sep 19, 2024
## 2.0 Specification ##

A prefix compression tables is represented by an object of SAI_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_TABLE. The creation of this object will allocate an empty table that can be used later to add specific entries to it. Table creation requires a stage to be associated with the table and also requires the type of table that is getting created: source addresses, destionation addresses or both.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please describe the changes to saiacl.h.

@rlhui
Copy link
Collaborator

rlhui commented Oct 7, 2024

There is only one .md file in this PR so far. I don't see "SAI-Proposal-ACL-Bincode.md" as mentioned in the PR description.

*
* @type sai_prefix_compression_type_t
* @flags MANDATORY_ON_CREATE | CREATE_ONLY
*/
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pls add  @isresource

sai_remove_prefix_compression_table_fn(
src_prefix_compression_table_id);

```
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please consider adding the workflow to identify the platforms of the below types using sai_object_type_get_availability() and using filters on SAI_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_TYPE:

  1. A single compression table of type SAI_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_TYPE_BOTH, 
  2. A compression table or type SAI_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_TYPE_SRC and another SAI_PREFIX_COMPRESSION_TYPE_DST

@tjchadaga tjchadaga requested a review from kcudnik October 7, 2024 16:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
reviewed PR is discussed in SAI Meeting
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants