Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Teloscan - Vite SSR #519

Closed
wants to merge 9 commits into from
Closed

Teloscan - Vite SSR #519

wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

ezra-sg
Copy link
Contributor

@ezra-sg ezra-sg commented Jan 31, 2024

Fixes #issue_number

Description

Test scenarios

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have cleaned up the code in the areas my change touches
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • I have checked my code and corrected any misspellings
  • I have removed any unnecessary console messages
  • I have included all english text to the translation file and/or created a new issue with the required translations for the currently supported languages
  • I have tested for mobile functionality and responsiveness
  • I have added appropriate test coverage

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 31, 2024

Deploy Preview for teloscan-stage failed.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 939b994
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/teloscan-stage/deploys/65c2d49e6392190008f72d8d

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 31, 2024

Deploy Preview for dev-mainnet-teloscan failed.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 939b994
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/dev-mainnet-teloscan/deploys/65c2d49ef5774c0008c770df

@ezra-sg ezra-sg changed the title Teloscan vite ssr Teloscan - Vite SSR Jan 31, 2024
@pmjanus pmjanus closed this Apr 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants