Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update text-buffer to version 12.1.0 🚀 #235

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🚨🔥⚠️ Action required: Switch to the new Greenkeeper now! 🚨🔥⚠️
This version of Greenkeper will be shutdown on May 31st.
With Integrations first-class bot support landed on GitHub and we’ve rewritten Greenkeeper to take full advantage of it. Simpler setup, fewer pull-requests, faster than ever.


Hello lovely humans,

text-buffer just published its new version 12.1.0.

State Update 🚀
Dependency text-buffer
New version 12.1.0
Type dependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of text-buffer.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


The new version differs by 864 commits .

  • fc24cf4 12.1.0
  • 57b5ce0 Merge pull request #229 from atom/revert-228-as-ns-scope-ids
  • ab772e7 Put back accidentally reverted code
  • a345d59 Use MarkerIndex.findBoundariesAfter in TestDecorationLayer
  • ee1bcb6 Use scopes, scope ids and tags
  • 3809a37 Revert "Support multiple text decoration layers and provide a built-in one based on markers"
  • 225bc41 12.0.0
  • 8c4220b Merge pull request #228 from atom/as-ns-scope-ids
  • dff963b :art:
  • f52f4d1 Fix remaining lint errors
  • e021171 Fix skipping more empty boundaries than the size of the query
  • ec5eed7 Clear previous boundaries when buffering a new marker window
  • cecb1f0 Remove unused constant
  • 773c3fe Fetch 50 boundaries at a time in MarkerTextDecorationLayerIterator
  • b0f92ee :arrow_up: superstring

There are 250 commits in total. See the full diff.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants