Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix path to main App in React docs #522

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jakeprime
Copy link

@jakeprime jakeprime commented Oct 25, 2024

Summary

Tiny single character correction in the React guide.

Pull Request checklist

  • Add/update test to cover these changes
  • Update documentation
  • Update CHANGELOG file

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced guidance for integrating React with Rails using Shakapacker.
    • Clarified setup instructions for Hot Module Replacement (HMR).
    • Updated steps for creating a basic demo app, including directory structure changes.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant updates to the documentation for integrating React with a Rails application using Shakapacker. Key changes include the relocation of Babel configuration from package.json to a new babel.config.js file, the expansion of Hot Module Replacement (HMR) setup instructions, and clarifications on creating a demo app. The webpack configuration is also adjusted to include the ReactRefreshWebpackPlugin for development mode. Additionally, the import path for the HelloMessage component is modified to reflect a new directory structure.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/react.md - Updated documentation for React integration with Rails.
- Added @babel/preset-react to Babel config.
- Moved Babel config from package.json to babel.config.js.
- Expanded HMR setup instructions.
- Clarified demo app creation steps.
- Modified import path for HelloMessage in application.js.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update react.md #514: The changes in this PR directly relate to the documentation for the app/javascript/packs/application.js file, which is also modified in the main PR, ensuring consistency in the setup instructions for integrating React with Rails.

Suggested reviewers

  • justin808

Poem

🐇 In the garden of code, where the React flowers bloom,
A new Babel config dispels the old gloom.
With HMR dancing, the changes are bright,
Setting up Rails, everything feels right!
So hop along, friends, let’s code and create,
For a seamless integration, it’s never too late! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docs/react.md (1)

Line range hint 1-24: Fix step numbering in the demo app section.

The numbered steps in the demo app section are not properly sequential. Step 9 appears twice, which could confuse readers following the instructions.

Please renumber the steps sequentially from 1 to 12:

  • The second occurrence of step 9 should be step 10
  • Current step 10 should be step 11
  • Current step 11 should be step 12
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1678b07 and 957d12f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/react.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/react.md (1)

159-159: LGTM! The import path is correct.

The relative path '../App' correctly points to the React component defined in app/javascript/App.js from app/javascript/packs/application.js.

Let's verify the path consistency across the documentation:

✅ Verification successful

The import path '../App' is correctly aligned with the documented file structure

The verification confirms that the documentation consistently describes:

  • The main app component at app/javascript/App.js
  • The entry point at app/javascript/packs/application.js

Therefore, the relative import path '../App' in the documentation is accurate, as it correctly represents how to import the App component from the packs directory.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the file paths mentioned in the documentation are consistent
# with the demo app structure described in the setup steps.

# Test 1: Check if App.js path is consistently referenced
rg -i 'app\.js|App\.js' docs/react.md

# Test 2: Check if the directory structure is consistently described
rg -i 'app/javascript/(packs/)?App' docs/react.md

Length of output: 1019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant