Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 23, 2023. It is now read-only.

fixed #13; commbined load_study.psp and check_job_status.psp #499

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

fixed #13; commbined load_study.psp and check_job_status.psp #499

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

RNAer
Copy link
Member

@RNAer RNAer commented Aug 15, 2013

No description provided.

@@ -40,7 +40,34 @@ else:
raise('Could not determine job identifier. study_id and meta_analysis_id are both empty.')

job_type_ids = form['job_type_id'].split(',')
# queued_data_load = form['queued_data_load']
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will probably fail with a key error if it doesn't exist?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's a comment line

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So it is. hehe! I think I need a vacation...

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:-D

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Doug Wendel notifications@github.comwrote:

In www/check_job_status.psp:

@@ -40,7 +40,34 @@ else:
raise('Could not determine job identifier. study_id and meta_analysis_id are both empty.')

job_type_ids = form['job_type_id'].split(',')
+# queued_data_load = form['queued_data_load']

So it is. hehe! I think I need a vacation...


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/499/files#r5801572
.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If it's commented old/broken/unused code, it should be deleted

@douginator2000
Copy link
Contributor

What was the motivation for refactoring?

@RNAer
Copy link
Member Author

RNAer commented Aug 15, 2013

to dynamically load "queued date to load" section and reduce code redundancy

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Doug Wendel notifications@github.comwrote:

What was the motivation for refactoring?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/499#issuecomment-22728378
.

@ElDeveloper
Copy link
Member

@RNAer is the main goal of this pull request to factor out the contents of these files? Or are you adding/removing some specific functionality we should check for (I cannot see anything, but it's worth asking).

@RNAer
Copy link
Member Author

RNAer commented Oct 16, 2013

Actually both. It fixed #13 and also reduce code redundancy. No
functionality changes though.

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Yoshiki Vázquez Baeza <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

@RNAer https://github.com/RNAer is the main goal of this pull request
to factor out the contents of these files? Or are you adding/removing some
specific functionality we should check for (I cannot see anything, but it's
worth asking).


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/499#issuecomment-26446723
.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants