fix crash browser owallet #973
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes to the handling and formatting of price values across various components in the application. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/pages/UniversalSwap/Component/HeaderTab.tsx (1)
115-115: Improved security and readability in price renderingThis change simplifies the price rendering logic and enhances security by replacing the likely use of
dangerouslySetInnerHTMLwith a direct rendering of the minimized price. This approach is safer and easier to maintain.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the
minimizefunction for better code documentation:// Render the minimized price value <div>{minimize(priceUsd.toString())}</div>src/pages/Pool-V3/components/PositionItem/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
278-290: Consider removing commented-out codeThere are several lines of commented-out code in this section that appear to be old formatting approaches. Since you've now standardized on using the
minimizefunction, these comments are no longer necessary and can be safely removed. This will improve code readability and maintainability.Consider applying this diff to remove the unused code:
- {/* {numberWithCommas(Number(formatNumbers(undefined)(xToY ? min : 1 / max)), undefined, { - maximumFractionDigits: 6 - })} */} - {/* {formatMoney(`${xToY ? min : 1 / max}`)} */} - {/* {showPrefix(xToY ? min : 1 / max, shorterPrefixConfig)} */} {' - '} - {/* {numberWithCommas(Number(formatNumbers(undefined)(xToY ? max : 1 / min)), undefined, { - maximumFractionDigits: 6 - })} */} - {/* {formatMoney(`${xToY ? max : 1 / min}`)} */} - {/* {showPrefix(xToY ? max : 1 / min, shorterPrefixConfig)} */}{' '}src/pages/Pool-V3/components/CreatePosition/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-1023: Consider refactoring for improved maintainability.While the recent changes are focused on price display formatting, the overall complexity of this component suggests that it might benefit from some refactoring:
- The component is quite large (1000+ lines). Consider breaking it down into smaller, more manageable sub-components.
- There are numerous state variables. Evaluate if some of these could be combined using a reducer or if some could be moved to a custom hook.
- Remove commented-out code (e.g., lines 920) to improve readability.
- Consider extracting some of the complex logic (like price calculations) into separate utility functions or custom hooks.
- Evaluate if some of the functions could be memoized to optimize performance.
These suggestions aim to improve the overall maintainability and readability of the component without changing its functionality.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- src/helper/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/pages/Pool-V3/components/CreatePosition/index.tsx (4 hunks)
- src/pages/Pool-V3/components/CreatePositionForm/index.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/pages/Pool-V3/components/NewPositionNoPool/index.tsx (0 hunks)
- src/pages/Pool-V3/components/PositionItem/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/pages/UniversalSwap/Component/HeaderTab.tsx (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/pages/Pool-V3/components/NewPositionNoPool/index.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/pages/UniversalSwap/Component/HeaderTab.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-324: Verify alignment with PR objectivesThe changes made to simplify the price rendering logic appear to be in line with the PR objective to "fix crash browser owallet using c". However, it's not immediately clear how this specific change addresses browser crashes.
Could you please provide more context on how this change contributes to fixing browser crashes? This will help ensure that the implementation aligns with the intended objectives.
Additionally, run the following script to check for any related changes or comments that might provide more context:
src/helper/index.tsx (1)
582-601: Improved handling of small numbers, but consider some refinements.The new implementation of
minimizefunction provides a more elegant solution for displaying very small numbers using subscript notation. This is a significant improvement in terms of readability for cryptocurrency prices.However, there are a few points to consider:
Input Validation: The function assumes the input is a valid number string. Consider adding input validation to handle potential errors gracefully.
Edge Cases: The current implementation doesn't handle negative numbers or scientific notation. It would be beneficial to add support for these cases.
Return Type Consistency: The function now returns either a string or a JSX element. This inconsistency might lead to unexpected behavior when used in different contexts.
Consider the following improvements:
- Add input validation:
if (isNaN(parseFloat(priceUsd))) { throw new Error('Invalid input: not a number'); }
- Handle negative numbers and scientific notation:
const absPrice = Math.abs(parseFloat(priceUsd)); const priceStr = absPrice.toFixed(20); // Convert to fixed notation
- Consider returning a consistent type, perhaps always returning a JSX element:
return ( <span> {priceUsd.startsWith('-') && '-'} {/* rest of the formatting logic */} </span> );To ensure the function works correctly with various inputs, we can create a test script:
This script will help verify the function's behavior with different inputs, including the edge cases we discussed.
src/pages/Pool-V3/components/PositionItem/index.tsx (2)
274-274: Improved formatting of price range displayThe use of the
minimizefunction here enhances code readability and maintainability. The conditional logicxToY ? min : 1 / maxensures the correct value is displayed based on the token order.
276-276: Consistent improvement in price range formattingThis change mirrors the improvement made in the previous line, using the
minimizefunction to format the maximum price range value. The conditional logicxToY ? max : 1 / mincorrectly handles the token order, ensuring consistency with the minimum value display.src/pages/Pool-V3/components/CreatePosition/index.tsx (1)
50-50: LGTM: New import added for number formatting.The
minimizefunction from the 'helper' module has been imported. This is likely to be used for formatting price displays, which aligns with the changes made in the render logic.src/pages/Pool-V3/components/CreatePositionForm/index.tsx (3)
1143-1144: Ensure consistent number formatting withminimizefunctionThe
minimizefunction is now used to formatleftInputRounded, replacing the previousnumberWithCommasfunction. Verify thatminimizeprovides the desired formatting, including handling of decimal places and readability.If
minimizemeets the formatting requirements and improves consistency across the app, this change is acceptable.
1169-1170: Ensure consistent number formatting withminimizefunctionAs with the
leftInputRounded, theminimizefunction is now used forrightInputRounded. Confirm that this function provides consistent and appropriate formatting for your application's needs.
1129-1131:⚠️ Potential issueFix invalid nesting of
<div>inside<p>elementThe HTML structure has a
<div>nested inside a<p>element, which is invalid HTML and may cause rendering issues. According to HTML specifications, a<p>element cannot contain block-level elements like<div>. This could lead to unexpected behavior in your application.Apply this diff to correct the nesting:
- <p> - <div> - 1 {tokenFrom.name} = {minimize(midPrice.x.toString())} {tokenTo.name} - </div> - </p> + <p> + 1 {tokenFrom.name} = {minimize(midPrice.x.toString())} {tokenTo.name} + </p>Alternatively, if the inner
<div>is needed for styling purposes, consider replacing the outer<p>with a<div>, or remove the inner<div>if it's not necessary.Likely invalid or redundant comment.
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
UI Improvements
dangerouslySetInnerHTMLwith standard JSX elements.Functionality Enhancements