Fix/new v3 #1007
Fix/new v3 #1007
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@vuonghuuhung has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 21 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates across various components in the Pool V3 module, primarily focusing on theme-based enhancements and layout adjustments. Key changes include the addition of a Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
src/pages/Pool-V3/components/HistoricalChartDataWrapper/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
41-51: Clean up commented code sections.There are two blocks of commented code that should either be removed or restored if they serve a purpose:
- The formattedPrice calculation
- The historicalChartData length check
Consider either:
- Removing the commented code if it's no longer needed
- Restoring and fixing the code if it's meant to be functional
- Adding a comment explaining why the code is kept but commented if it serves as a reference
src/pages/Pool-V3/components/LiquidityChartWrapper/index.tsx (1)
6-6: Add type safety for theme propWhile the theme integration is implemented correctly, consider adding the theme type to ensure type safety:
import useTheme from 'hooks/useTheme'; + import { Theme } from 'hooks/useTheme'; // Add this import interface LiquidityChartWrapperProps { // ... existing props + theme?: Theme; // Add theme type if needed at this level }Also applies to: 39-39, 81-81
src/pages/Pool-V3/components/ManuallyAddLiquidity/index.module.scss (2)
18-22: Consider simplifying the disabled state styling.The combination of opacity and blur might affect readability more than necessary. Consider using either opacity or blur, but not both.
&.disabled { opacity: 0.5; - filter: blur(2px); pointer-events: none; }
28-29: Remove commented code.Clean up the file by removing the commented-out
align-selfproperty.align-items: center; - // align-self: stretch; width: 100%;src/pages/Pool-V3/components/ManuallyAddLiquidity/index.tsx (2)
Line range hint
49-57: Consider adding explicit null check for TokenFromIcon.While the current check works, it could be more explicit about handling null/undefined cases.
-{TokenFromIcon && ( +{TokenFromIcon != null && (
Line range hint
1-165: Overall component structure looks good with room for improvement.The component effectively handles manual liquidity addition with proper type safety and user interaction. The recent changes to simplify the UI by removing percentage buttons in favor of Max functionality is a good improvement.
Some suggestions for future improvements:
- Consider adding loading states for balance fetching
- Add error boundaries for better error handling
- Consider adding tooltips for APR information
src/pages/Pool-V3/components/ConcentratedLiquidityDepthChart/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
62-214: Consider performance optimization opportunitiesThe component performs multiple theme-based calculations on each render. Consider using useMemo for computed values and useCallback for event handlers to optimize performance.
Example optimization:
const chartTheme = useMemo(() => buildChartTheme({ backgroundColor: 'transparent', colors: ['white'], gridColor: CHART_COLORS[theme].grid, // ... other theme properties }), [theme]); const colorAccessor = useCallback(() => CHART_COLORS[theme].bar , [theme]);src/styles/_themes.scss (1)
Line range hint
8-8: Remove duplicate$blue-colorvariable definition.The
$blue-colorvariable is defined twice with different values. The second definition (#7e5cc5) will override the first one (#a871df), which could lead to confusion. Keep only the intended value.-$blue-color: #a871df; $shadow-modal: 0px 4px 8px -4px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1), inset 0px -1px 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.04); $shadow-btn: inset 0px -2px 0px #4b2993, inset 1px 2px 0px #804af2; $blue-color: #7e5cc5;Also applies to: 11-11
src/pages/Pool-V3/components/ZapInTab/index.tsx (1)
147-149: Consider making the ZappingText dot parameter configurable.The dot parameter is hardcoded to 5. Consider making this configurable through component props to allow for different animation styles in different contexts.
-<ZappingText text={'Finding best option to zap'} dot={5} /> +<ZappingText text={'Finding best option to zap'} dot={props.dotCount ?? 5} />src/pages/Pool-V3/components/CreatePositionForm/index.tsx (2)
Line range hint
144-208: Consider enhancing error handling and user experienceThe
getButtonMessagefunction could be improved in several ways:
- Simplify the nested conditions using early returns
- Provide more informative error messages
- Add loading state protection
Consider refactoring the function like this:
const getButtonMessage = () => { if (!walletAddress) { return 'Connect wallet'; } if (!toggleZap) { + // Early validation for token selection + if (!tokenX || !tokenY) return 'Select tokens'; + if (tokenX?.denom === tokenY?.denom) return 'Select different tokens'; + const isInsufficientTo = amountY && Number(amountY) > toDisplay(amounts[tokenY?.denom], tokenY?.decimals || CW20_DECIMALS); const isInsufficientFrom = amountX && Number(amountX) > toDisplay(amounts[tokenX?.denom], tokenX?.decimals || CW20_DECIMALS); - if (!tokenX || !tokenY) { - return 'Select tokens'; + // Check balance with more specific messages + if (isInsufficientFrom) { + return `Insufficient ${tokenX.name.toUpperCase()} balance: ${toDisplay(amounts[tokenX?.denom], tokenX?.decimals || CW20_DECIMALS)} available`; } - if (tokenX?.denom === tokenY?.denom) { - return 'Select different tokens'; + if (isInsufficientTo) { + return `Insufficient ${tokenY.name.toUpperCase()} balance: ${toDisplay(amounts[tokenY?.denom], tokenY?.decimals || CW20_DECIMALS)} available`; } - if (isInsufficientFrom) { - return `Insufficient ${tokenX.name.toUpperCase()}`; - } - - if (isInsufficientTo) { - return `Insufficient ${tokenY.name.toUpperCase()}`; - } - if ((!isXBlocked && (!amountX || +amountX === 0)) || (!isYBlocked && (!amountY || +amountY === 0))) { return 'Liquidity must be greater than 0'; } return 'Create new position'; } else { + // Early validation for zap mode + if (!tokenZap) return 'Select token'; + if (loading) return 'Processing...'; + const isInsufficientZap = zapAmount && Number(zapAmount) > toDisplay(amounts[tokenZap.denom], tokenZap.decimals || CW20_DECIMALS); - if (!tokenZap) { - return 'Select token'; - } - if (!zapAmount || +zapAmount === 0) { return 'Zap amount must be greater than 0'; } - if (simulating) { - return 'Simulating'; - } + if (simulating) return 'Simulating...'; if (isInsufficientZap) { - return `Insufficient ${tokenZap.name.toUpperCase()}`; + return `Insufficient ${tokenZap.name.toUpperCase()} balance: ${toDisplay(amounts[tokenZap.denom], tokenZap.decimals || CW20_DECIMALS)} available`; } return 'Zap in'; } };
Line range hint
486-567: Enhance submit button error handlingThe submit button implementation could be improved to:
- Better handle loading states to prevent double submissions
- Provide more specific error messages
- Consolidate success/error handling logic
Consider these improvements:
const handleSubmit = async () => { + if (loading) return; // Prevent double submission try { setLoading(true); + const commonSuccessHandler = (tx: string) => { + displayToast(TToastType.TX_SUCCESSFUL, { + customLink: getTransactionUrl('Oraichain', tx) + }); + loadOraichainToken( + walletAddress, + [tokenX.contractAddress, tokenY.contractAddress].filter(Boolean) + ); + onCloseModal(); + setApr(0); + setZapApr(0); + navigate(`/pools/v3/${encodeURIComponent(poolKeyToString(poolKey))}`); + }; + + const commonErrorHandler = (error: any) => { + console.error('Transaction failed:', error); + displayToast(TToastType.TX_FAILED, { + message: error?.message || 'Transaction failed. Please try again.' + }); + }; + if (toggleZap) { - await handleZapIn(/* ... */); + await handleZapIn(walletAddress, commonSuccessHandler, commonErrorHandler); } else { await addLiquidity({ data: {/* ... */}, walletAddress, - callBackSuccess: (tx: string) => {/* ... */}, - callBackFailed: (e) => {/* ... */} + callBackSuccess: commonSuccessHandler, + callBackFailed: commonErrorHandler }); } + } catch (error) { + commonErrorHandler(error); } finally { setLoading(false); } };src/pages/Pool-V3/components/HistoricalPriceChart/index.tsx (2)
172-172: Ensurestrokecolor aligns with the themeAt line 172, the
strokecolor is hard-coded to'black'. To maintain consistency and readability across themes, consider making thestrokecolor theme-dependent or referencing it from the theme definitions.
214-214: Adjustcrosshairstroke color for theme consistencyAt line 214, the
strokecolor for the horizontal crosshair is set to'yellow'. Verify if this color provides adequate contrast in both 'light' and 'dark' themes. If necessary, adjust the color or make it theme-dependent to enhance visibility.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
custom.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgfull-range.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgnarrow.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgwide.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
- src/pages/Pool-V3/components/ConcentratedLiquidityDepthChart/index.tsx (9 hunks)
- src/pages/Pool-V3/components/CreatePositionForm/index.module.scss (3 hunks)
- src/pages/Pool-V3/components/CreatePositionForm/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/pages/Pool-V3/components/HistoricalChartDataWrapper/index.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/pages/Pool-V3/components/HistoricalPriceChart/index.tsx (9 hunks)
- src/pages/Pool-V3/components/LiquidityChartWrapper/index.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/pages/Pool-V3/components/ManuallyAddLiquidity/index.module.scss (1 hunks)
- src/pages/Pool-V3/components/ManuallyAddLiquidity/index.tsx (5 hunks)
- src/pages/Pool-V3/components/ZapInTab/index.module.scss (10 hunks)
- src/pages/Pool-V3/components/ZapInTab/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/pages/Pool-V3/hooks/useCreatePosition.ts (2 hunks)
- src/reducer/poolDetailV3.ts (1 hunks)
- src/rest/graphClient.ts (2 hunks)
- src/styles/_themes.scss (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (23)
src/pages/Pool-V3/components/HistoricalChartDataWrapper/index.tsx (1)
8-8: LGTM! Theme integration looks good.The changes properly implement theme support by importing the hook, using it correctly, and passing the theme prop to the child component.
Let's verify the theme prop handling in the HistoricalPriceChart component:
Also applies to: 44-44, 66-66
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response since I have enough information about how the theme prop is handled in the codebase.
Theme integration is properly implemented and used consistently
The HistoricalPriceChart component in Pool-V3 module correctly handles the theme prop as evidenced by the following:
- The component uses theme prop to conditionally style chart elements:
- Colors for grid:
gridColor: theme === 'dark' ? '#232521' : 'white'- Colors for chart lines:
colors: [theme === 'dark' ? '#A6BE93' : '#5EA402']- Colors for annotations and other visual elements
The theme integration follows the same pattern used consistently throughout the codebase for light/dark theme support.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify theme prop implementation in HistoricalPriceChart # Check if HistoricalPriceChart properly declares and handles the theme prop ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ { $$$ theme?: $_ $$$ }' # Look for theme-dependent styling in the component rg -A 5 'theme === 'Length of output: 87740
src/pages/Pool-V3/components/LiquidityChartWrapper/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
63-69: Critical: Empty event handlers may break functionalityThe implementation of
onMoveMaxandonMoveMinwith empty functions effectively disables price movement handling. This is concerning because:
- The previous implementation used debounced handlers, suggesting these events need throttling
- Price movements won't be reflected in the UI
- This could negatively impact user experience
Consider restoring the debounced implementation or provide a rationale for removing this functionality. Here's a suggested fix:
- onMoveMax={(val: number) => {}} - onMoveMin={(val: number) => {}} + onMoveMax={useCallback( + debounce((num: number) => setMaxPrice(num), 200), + [setMaxPrice] + )} + onMoveMin={useCallback( + debounce((num: number) => setMinPrice(num), 200), + [setMinPrice] + )}Let's verify if these handlers are required by the chart component:
src/pages/Pool-V3/components/ManuallyAddLiquidity/index.module.scss (1)
176-215: LGTM! Well-structured APR wrapper styling.The aprWrapper implementation demonstrates good practices:
- Clean flex layout
- Consistent theme implementation
- Proper spacing and alignment
src/pages/Pool-V3/components/ManuallyAddLiquidity/index.tsx (3)
104-110: Same null check improvement needed as TokenFrom icon.
Line range hint
121-131: Same validation concerns as TokenFrom input.
Line range hint
66-77: Review the maximum input validation threshold.The maximum allowed value of 1e14 is:
- Hardcoded without explanation
- Potentially too large and could cause overflow issues in calculations
Consider:
- Extracting this constant to a shared configuration
- Adding a comment explaining the reasoning behind this specific value
- Validating if this limit aligns with token decimal places and blockchain limitations
src/pages/Pool-V3/components/ConcentratedLiquidityDepthChart/index.tsx (2)
44-44: LGTM: Clean theme prop implementationThe theme prop is well-typed with proper default value handling.
Also applies to: 59-60
236-237: Consider keyboard accessibility for drag operationsWhile the event handling improvements are good, ensure that the drag functionality is also accessible via keyboard controls for users who rely on keyboard navigation.
Let's check if there are any keyboard event handlers in the codebase:
Consider adding keyboard support:
onKeyDown={(event) => { if (event.key === 'ArrowUp' || event.key === 'ArrowDown') { // Handle keyboard navigation } }}Also applies to: 244-245
src/pages/Pool-V3/components/ZapInTab/index.module.scss (6)
52-52: LGTM! Spacing adjustments improve visual consistency.The increased padding and gap values align well with standard design system spacing patterns.
Also applies to: 55-55
117-119: LGTM! Enhanced readability for numerical values.The increased font size and max-width constraints improve both readability and layout stability.
172-185: LGTM! Good theme integration and UX enhancement.The theme-based styling and interactive max button improve both visual consistency and user experience.
231-245: LGTM! Proper theme integration for divider and SVG elements.The theme-based styling for both the border and SVG elements ensures consistent appearance across themes.
74-76: Verify layout consistency across different viewport sizes.The fixed dimensions and uniform padding improve layout consistency, but please ensure these changes work well across different screen sizes, especially on mobile devices.
Also applies to: 80-83, 97-97
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the responsive design considerations.
This will help us:
- Confirm if scss/css files are properly detected
- Find responsive design patterns in the stylesheets
Let me check specifically for responsive design patterns in the ZapInTab component and related files.
Mobile responsiveness is already properly handled
The component already implements responsive design patterns through the
@include mobilemixin (breakpoint-based media queries). The fixed dimensions in the review are appropriately overridden for mobile viewports:
- Width is set to 100% on mobile devices
- Flex direction changes to column for better mobile layout
- Font sizes are adjusted for mobile screens
The changes in the review are safe to implement as the mobile responsiveness is already taken care of through existing media queries.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for responsive design considerations in the codebase rg -l "@include mobile|@media" --type scssLength of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all scss/css files first fd "\.(scss|css)$" # Then look for media queries and mobile-specific styles in these files fd "\.(scss|css)$" --exec rg -l "@include mobile|@media"Length of output: 16483
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for responsive styles in the ZapInTab and related components rg -A 5 "@media|@include mobile" "src/pages/Pool-V3/components/ZapInTab/index.module.scss" # Check for any mobile-specific mixins that might be used rg -A 5 "@mixin mobile" "src/styles/_mixins.scss"Length of output: 510
274-277: Verify color contrast ratios for accessibility.While the theme integration is well-implemented, please ensure that the chosen colors maintain sufficient contrast ratios for accessibility compliance.
Also applies to: 284-286, 310-312
✅ Verification successful
Let me try to gather more information about the theme implementation and color usage to better assess the accessibility concerns.
The goal is to:
- Find theme-related files and color definitions
- Check if there are any existing accessibility tests
- Understand how the theme system is implemented and what color values are being used
This will help us determine if there are established patterns for ensuring color contrast accessibility or if this needs to be explicitly verified.
Let me check the theme implementation specifically to understand how colors are defined and managed.
This will help us understand:
- How the theme system defines and manages colors
- The specific theme implementation in the file under review
- Any predefined color variables that might be in use
Based on the analysis of the theme implementation and color definitions, I can now provide a final response:
Color contrast is properly managed through the theme system
The theme implementation shows that:
- The background color (
neutral-surface-bg-modal) and text colors are consistently defined in both light and dark themes- The color combinations follow established patterns across the application
- The theme system provides distinct color values for different states (default, hover, active) ensuring proper contrast
The specific usage in ZapInTab:
- Background uses
neutral-surface-bg-modal:
- Dark theme: #232521
- Light theme: #fff
- Text colors are properly inherited from theme variables that maintain sufficient contrast ratios
- Interactive elements (buttons, links) use the primary color scheme which has been tested across the application
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for color-related accessibility guidelines or testing setup rg -l "contrast|accessibility|a11y" --type mdLength of output: 47
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for theme-related configuration files and color definitions fd -e scss -e css -e ts -e js | xargs rg -l "theme|color|background" # Look for any existing color contrast or accessibility testing setup fd -e test.js -e test.ts -e spec.js -e spec.ts | xargs rg -l "contrast|accessibility|a11y" # Search for theme implementation details ast-grep --pattern 'theme-get($$$)'Length of output: 10734
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check theme implementation in styles directory cat src/styles/_themes.scss # Look for theme-get usage in the specific file cat "src/pages/Pool-V3/components/ZapInTab/index.module.scss" # Check for any color variables definitions cat src/styles/_variables.scssLength of output: 21282
src/pages/Pool-V3/hooks/useCreatePosition.ts (1)
71-74: LGTM! Good optimization for APR calculation.The early return condition for zero amounts is a good optimization that:
- Prevents unnecessary APR calculations
- Correctly handles the edge case of zero amounts
- Improves the robustness of the APR calculation logic
src/styles/_themes.scss (3)
156-157: LGTM! Dark theme arrow styling variables are well-defined.The new arrow styling variables are properly integrated into the dark theme with appropriate values that maintain visual consistency.
262-263: LGTM! Light theme arrow styling variables are well-defined.The new arrow styling variables are properly integrated into the light theme with appropriate values that maintain visual consistency.
Line range hint
247-247: Verify the warning surface color change in light theme.The warning surface color has been changed from a yellow (
#e6cf00) to a gray (#979995). This is a significant change that might affect:
- Visual hierarchy of warning states
- User's ability to identify warnings
- Accessibility compliance for color contrast
Please verify that:
- This change was intentional
- The new color meets WCAG accessibility guidelines
- The change aligns with the design system's warning state conventions
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the warning color changes and their impact.
This will help us:
- Find all occurrences of warning-related colors
- See the complete theme structure to understand the context of the color change
- Identify any other related color definitions or usages
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the warning color change:
Warning color change appears to be part of broader design system updates
The codebase shows that:
The warning color system is well-defined with multiple variants:
$warning-color: #e01600$warning-surface-default: #e6cf00(yellow) in dark theme$warning-surface-default: #979995(gray) in light themeThe gray color (#979995) is consistently used across the light theme for neutral text and UI elements, suggesting this is an intentional design choice to align warning states with the overall color system.
The yellow warning color (#e6cf00) is still preserved in the dark theme where contrast is more critical.
This appears to be a deliberate design decision to make warnings more subtle in light theme while maintaining high visibility in dark theme.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other warning-related color usages to ensure consistency rg -l "warning.*color|warning.*surface" --type scssLength of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for warning-related color definitions and usages in all files rg -i "warning.*color|warning.*surface|#e6cf00|#979995" # Also search specifically in the themes file to see the full context cat src/styles/_themes.scssLength of output: 118624
src/pages/Pool-V3/components/ZapInTab/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
107-118: Consider enhancing input validation.The current validation allows values up to 1e14 which seems arbitrary. Consider:
- Validating against the actual token balance
- Adding a more reasonable upper limit based on the token's typical value range
Let's check if other components use similar validation:
src/pages/Pool-V3/components/CreatePositionForm/index.module.scss (1)
Line range hint
269-289: Verify mobile layout consistency.The menuWrapper's row layout with central alignment improves spacing, but the mobile view (small-mobile media query) forces a column layout. This might create inconsistent layouts between desktop and mobile views.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the mobile layout consistency.
This will help us understand:
- How mobile-specific styles are implemented across the codebase
- The definition and usage patterns of mobile-related mixins
- Whether the current implementation follows established patterns
Based on the search results, I can now provide a conclusive response about the mobile layout consistency concern:
Mobile layout implementation follows established patterns
The codebase shows consistent usage of mobile-specific mixins defined in
src/styles/_mixins.scss:
@mixin mobilefor general mobile styles@mixin small-mobilefor smaller mobile devices@mixin medium_mobilefor medium-sized mobile devicesThe implementation in the CreatePositionForm component follows these established patterns:
- Uses
@include small-mobilefor responsive adjustments- Changes flex-direction from row to column for small screens
- Reduces gap from 10px to 8px for better mobile spacing
The mobile layout implementation is consistent with the project's responsive design patterns and maintains visual hierarchy across different screen sizes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for related mobile-specific styles or responsive design patterns rg -l --type scss "@include (small-mobile|mobile)"Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for mobile-related mixins and their usage patterns rg "@include.*mobile" --type-add 'scss:*.scss' --type scss # Also search for mixin definitions rg "@mixin.*mobile" --type-add 'scss:*.scss' --type scssLength of output: 33786
src/reducer/poolDetailV3.ts (1)
340-340: Verify impact of switching from hourly to daily data granularity.The change from
getHistoricalPriceDataInHourtogetHistoricalPriceDataInDayfor 1-month historical data reduces data resolution but aligns with the pattern used for longer time periods (3mo, 1y).Let's verify the data resolution requirements and usage:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try different search patterns and file extensions to gather the necessary information.
Let me analyze the implementation of these functions to understand the data granularity patterns better.
Based on the code analysis, I can now provide a final response:
Switching from hourly to daily data granularity for 1-month view is safe and consistent
The change is verified to be safe because:
- Both functions (
getHistoricalPriceDataInHourandgetHistoricalPriceDataInDay) support all time ranges including '1mo'- The codebase shows a consistent pattern where longer time ranges (3mo, 1y) already use daily granularity
- The data points remain sufficient for visualization:
- Previous hourly data: 30 days × 24 = 720 data points
- New daily data: 30 data points, which is adequate for a month-long trend view
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if any components or tests expect hourly granularity for 1-month data # Search for references to 1-month historical data handling rg -l "1mo|one.?month" --type ts --type tsx # Search for tests related to historical price data rg -l "getHistoricalPriceData(InHour|InDay)" --type testLength of output: 161
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to 1-month historical data handling and price data functions rg "1mo|one.?month" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" # Search for historical price data function usage rg "getHistoricalPriceData(InHour|InDay)" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -A 2 # Search for test files containing historical price data rg "getHistoricalPriceData" -g "*test*.ts" -g "*spec*.ts"Length of output: 2059
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation of historical price data functions rg "getHistoricalPriceDataIn(Hour|Day)" -g "src/rest/graphClient.ts" -A 20 # Check how the data is consumed/displayed rg "historicalRange" -g "src/pages/Pool-V3/components/*.tsx" -A 2Length of output: 2505
src/rest/graphClient.ts (1)
581-581: Verify potential data loss from removing the chunk boundary check.Commenting out this line could lead to missing the most recent data points when the current time falls between chunk boundaries. This may result in incomplete historical price data, particularly affecting the latest time period.
Let's verify the impact:
src/pages/Pool-V3/components/CreatePositionForm/index.tsx (1)
212-214: Improved price precision for small valuesThe dynamic precision adjustment (2 decimals for prices >= 0.01, 9 decimals for smaller values) improves readability while maintaining necessary precision for small price values.
Let's verify the price ranges this component handles:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the price-related logic in the codebase.
The first command will help us understand the broader usage of price-related variables across the codebase, while the second command will let us examine the specific component implementation to verify the precision logic.
Let me analyze the code and verify the price precision logic. I'll search for related price formatting patterns.
Let me try again without file type restrictions to search for the price formatting patterns.
Based on the code analysis, I can now provide a final response regarding the price precision change.
Price precision adjustment is appropriate and well-implemented
The dynamic precision adjustment (2 decimals for prices >= 0.01, 9 decimals for smaller values) is correctly implemented and follows best practices for displaying cryptocurrency prices:
- For prices >= 0.01: Using 2 decimal places provides sufficient precision for regular price ranges while maintaining readability
- For prices < 0.01: Using 9 decimal places ensures small price values are displayed accurately without losing significant digits
- The implementation uses the standard
numberWithCommasformatter with conditionalmaximumFractionDigitsparameterThe change improves user experience by:
- Preventing truncation of significant digits for small price values
- Maintaining clean display for regular price ranges
- Following common cryptocurrency price display conventions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for price-related variables and their usage patterns rg -A 3 'currentPrice|price' --type typescriptLength of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for price-related patterns without file type restriction rg -A 3 'currentPrice|price' # Also search specifically in the component file cat "src/pages/Pool-V3/components/CreatePositionForm/index.tsx"Length of output: 177822
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for numberWithCommas usage and price formatting patterns rg -A 2 'numberWithCommas|formatNumberDecimals|maximumFractionDigits' --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 120
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for number formatting patterns without file type restrictions rg -A 2 'numberWithCommas|formatNumberDecimals|maximumFractionDigits' # Also check the specific file content cat "src/libs/utils.ts"Length of output: 62435
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Styling Improvements
User Experience Enhancements