Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(ext-service): remove unused method #4086

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2024
Merged

chore(ext-service): remove unused method #4086

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

bytemain
Copy link
Member

@bytemain bytemain commented Oct 11, 2024

Types

  • 🧹 Chores

Background or solution

一些 cleanup

Changelog

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 新功能

    • 更新了语言设置中刷新操作的本地化字符串,从“现在”更改为“刷新”。
  • 改进

    • 优化了扩展服务的重启逻辑,确保在页面可见时才执行重启。
    • 统一了日志记录,使用新的日志标签替代旧的实例ID。
  • 修复

    • 移除了未使用的方法,简化了接口结构。

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Walkthrough

此拉取请求主要涉及对IExtensionNodeService接口中getElectronMainThreadListenPath2方法的重命名为getElectronMainThreadListenPath,并对相关测试进行了相应的更新。此外,对ExtensionServiceImplExtensionNodeServiceImpl类进行了多项修改,包括对重启进程逻辑的异步处理、文档可见性检查以及日志记录方式的更新。同时,更新了本地化字符串以改善用户界面文本的准确性。

Changes

文件路径 更改摘要
packages/extension/tests/node/extension.service.test.ts getElectronMainThreadListenPath2方法重命名为getElectronMainThreadListenPath,并更新了测试用例。
packages/extension/src/browser/extension.service.ts 修改restartProgress方法以异步调用this.progressService.withProgress,并增加了文档可见性检查。
packages/extension/src/common/extension.ts IExtensionNodeService接口中移除了getElectronMainThreadListenPath2方法。
packages/extension/src/node/extension.service.ts instanceId属性重命名为LOG_TAG,并移除getElectronMainThreadListenPath2方法。
packages/i18n/src/common/en-US.lang.ts 更新了本地化字符串'preference.general.language.change.refresh.now'的值,从'Now'改为'Refresh'
packages/terminal-next/src/browser/terminal.controller.ts widget.name = client.name;更改为widget.rename(client.name);,以改善代码清晰度。

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • Ricbet

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
packages/extension/__tests__/node/extension.service.test.ts (2)

160-160: 方法名称更新看起来不错!

方法名从 getElectronMainThreadListenPath2 更改为 getElectronMainThreadListenPath 是一个很好的简化。这种变更提高了代码的一致性和可读性。

建议检查并更新相关的文档(如果有的话),以确保它们反映了这个方法名的变化。这将有助于保持文档与代码的同步,并避免将来可能出现的混淆。


Line range hint 1-180: 对测试文件的整体建议

在审查整个文件后,我有以下几点建议:

  1. 跳过的测试:文件中有使用 it.skip 的测试。建议检查这些被跳过的测试,确定是否可以启用它们,或者如果它们不再相关,是否应该删除。

  2. 全局变量操作:测试中多次修改 (global as any).isDev。这种做法可能导致测试之间的相互影响。建议考虑使用更加隔离的方法来模拟开发环境,例如使用依赖注入或环境变量。

  3. 异步测试:文件中大量使用异步测试。确保所有的 async 函数都正确地使用了 await,以防止潜在的竞态条件。

  4. 测试覆盖率:虽然测试覆盖了许多场景,但可以考虑添加更多的边缘情况测试,特别是针对错误处理和异常情况。

  5. 清理操作:每个测试后都有清理操作,这很好。确保这些清理操作足够全面,能够完全重置测试环境。

考虑重构测试设置,使用更现代的测试实践,如 beforeEach/afterEach 钩子来设置和清理测试环境,这样可以减少重复代码并提高测试的可维护性。

packages/extension/src/node/extension.service.ts (3)

77-77: 赞同更改,建议小改进

instanceId 重命名为 LOG_TAG 提高了代码的可读性,很好地表达了其用途。使用 Date.now() 确保了每个实例的唯一性,有助于在日志中区分不同的实例。

建议考虑使用更精确的时间戳方法,如 performance.now(),以避免在同一毫秒内创建多个实例时可能出现的冲突。

考虑使用以下实现:

-private LOG_TAG = 'ExtensionNodeServiceImpl:' + Date.now();
+private LOG_TAG = `ExtensionNodeServiceImpl:${performance.now().toFixed(3)}`;

191-192: 日志更新得当,建议统一格式

日志语句的更新与将 instanceId 重命名为 LOG_TAG 的变更保持一致,这很好。新增的错误日志提供了有关进程数量限制的更详细信息,这对调试很有帮助。

为了保持一致性,建议在所有使用 LOG_TAG 的日志语句中采用相同的格式。

考虑统一日志格式,例如:

-this.logger.log('setExtProcessConnectionForward', this.LOG_TAG);
+this.logger.log(`[${this.LOG_TAG}] setExtProcessConnectionForward`);

-this.logger.log(this.LOG_TAG, 'create extension process for client:', clientId);
+this.logger.log(`[${this.LOG_TAG}] create extension process for client: ${clientId}`);

 this.logger.error(
-  `Process count is over limit, max count is ${maxExtProcessCount}, try kill`,
-  killProcessClientId,
+  `[${this.LOG_TAG}] Process count is over limit, max count is ${maxExtProcessCount}, try kill ${killProcessClientId}`
 );

Also applies to: 247-247, 256-259


247-259: 日志改进有助于调试,建议进一步优化

createProcess 方法的更改提供了更详细的日志记录,这对调试和监控非常有益:

  1. 使用 LOG_TAG 更新了日志语句,保持了一致性。
  2. 在进程数量超过限制时,错误日志中包含了 killProcessClientId,有助于跟踪哪个进程被终止。

这些改进对于问题诊断很有帮助。然而,我们可以进一步优化错误处理。

考虑将错误日志封装在一个专门的方法中,以便于重用和维护:

+private logProcessLimitError(maxCount: number, killProcessClientId: string) {
+  this.logger.error(
+    `[${this.LOG_TAG}] Process count is over limit, max count is ${maxCount}, try kill ${killProcessClientId}`
+  );
+}

 if (processClientIdArr.length >= maxExtProcessCount) {
   const killProcessClientId = processClientIdArr[0];
   this.disposeClientExtProcess(killProcessClientId);
-  this.logger.error(
-    `Process count is over limit, max count is ${maxExtProcessCount}, try kill`,
-    killProcessClientId,
-  );
+  this.logProcessLimitError(maxExtProcessCount, killProcessClientId);
 }

这样可以使主方法更简洁,并且便于在其他地方重用这个错误日志逻辑。

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c3f851d and 88185f5.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • packages/extension/tests/node/extension.service.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/extension/src/browser/extension.service.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/extension/src/common/extension.ts (0 hunks)
  • packages/extension/src/node/extension.service.ts (3 hunks)
  • packages/i18n/src/common/en-US.lang.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/terminal-next/src/browser/terminal.controller.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • packages/extension/src/common/extension.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • packages/i18n/src/common/en-US.lang.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/extension/src/node/extension.service.ts (3)

Line range hint 191-259: 代码可读性提升,值得赞赏

setExtProcessConnectionForward 方法的更改提高了代码的可读性:

  1. 使用对象解构来处理 connectionResult 参数,使代码更简洁明了。
  2. 日志更新与之前的更改保持一致,使用了 LOG_TAG

这些改进有助于代码的维护和理解。


Line range hint 1-613: 总体评价:代码质量提升,可维护性增强

本次更改主要集中在以下几个方面:

  1. 改进了日志记录,使用 LOG_TAG 替代 instanceId,提高了日志的可读性和一致性。
  2. 删除了未使用的 getElectronMainThreadListenPath2 方法,减少了代码冗余。
  3. createProcess 方法中增加了更详细的错误日志,有助于问题诊断。
  4. setExtProcessConnectionForward 方法进行了小幅优化,提高了代码可读性。

这些更改总体上提升了代码质量和可维护性,有利于长期的项目维护和开发。建议在合并这些更改时,确保进行充分的测试,特别是对于已删除方法的影响进行验证。


Line range hint 1-613: 验证方法移除的影响

移除未使用的 getElectronMainThreadListenPath2 方法有助于提高代码的可维护性。然而,我们应该确保这个方法在代码库的其他地方没有被使用,以避免潜在的破坏性变更。

请运行以下脚本来验证 getElectronMainThreadListenPath2 方法是否在其他地方被使用:

如果脚本没有输出结果,则可以确认该方法的移除不会影响其他部分的代码。

packages/terminal-next/src/browser/terminal.controller.ts (1)

383-383: 重构改进:使用专用的重命名方法

这个改动将直接赋值 widget.name = client.name; 替换为调用 widget.rename(client.name); 方法。这是一个很好的重构,因为:

  1. 它封装了重命名的逻辑到 widget 对象内部,提高了代码的模块化程度。
  2. 使用专门的方法可能允许在重命名过程中执行额外的逻辑,比如验证或事件触发。
  3. 这种方式更符合面向对象编程的原则,提高了代码的可维护性和可扩展性。
packages/extension/src/browser/extension.service.ts (1)

415-415: 在 'withProgress' 前添加 'await' 可能的影响

通过在 this.progressService.withProgress 前添加 await,现在控制流程将等待进度操作完成再继续。这可能会影响 this.isExtProcessRestarting = false; 的执行时机。请确认此更改不会引入任何意外的延迟或影响应用程序的状态。

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 28.57143% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 54.38%. Comparing base (0b2824e) to head (88185f5).
Report is 21 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
packages/extension/src/node/extension.service.ts 40.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
...ackages/extension/src/browser/extension.service.ts 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...s/terminal-next/src/browser/terminal.controller.ts 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4086      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   54.41%   54.38%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files        1590     1591       +1     
  Lines       97268    97331      +63     
  Branches    19906    19924      +18     
==========================================
+ Hits        52924    52929       +5     
- Misses      36830    36875      +45     
- Partials     7514     7527      +13     
Flag Coverage Δ
jsdom 49.93% <0.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
node 15.63% <28.57%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bytemain bytemain merged commit 10120c4 into main Oct 11, 2024
14 checks passed
@bytemain bytemain deleted the fix/ext-restart branch October 11, 2024 11:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants