-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 377
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: incorrect actionType in data reporting #4084
Conversation
Walkthrough此次更改涉及 Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CodeEditorWithHighlight
participant aiReporter
User->>CodeEditorWithHighlight: 插入代码
CodeEditorWithHighlight->>aiReporter: aiReporter.end({ actionType: ActionTypeEnum.ChatInsertCode })
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/ai-native/src/browser/components/ChatEditor.tsx (2)
95-95
: 修改正确,建议小改进这个修改很好地解决了 PR 中提到的问题,将
actionType
从ChatCopyCode
更改为ChatInsertCode
,更准确地反映了插入代码的操作。这将提高 AI 报告的准确性。为了保持一致性,建议也更新函数名称以反映这个变化。
考虑将函数名从
handleInsert
改为更具描述性的名称,如handleCodeInsert
。这样可以更好地与handleCopy
函数对应,并更清楚地表明其功能。例如:-const handleInsert = useCallback(() => { +const handleCodeInsert = useCallback(() => { // 函数内容保持不变 }, [monacoCommandRegistry]);请注意更新所有调用此函数的地方。
Line range hint
1-284
: 文件整体质量良好,有潜在改进空间虽然这次只修改了一行代码,但整个文件的结构和实现都很不错。以下是一些观察和建议:
- 组件结构清晰,使用了 React 钩子,遵循了 React 最佳实践。
- 代码分割得当,每个组件都有明确的职责。
- 使用了 TypeScript,提高了代码的类型安全性。
未来可能的改进:
- 考虑将一些较大的组件(如
CodeEditorWithHighlight
)拆分成更小的子组件,以提高可维护性。- 可以添加更多的单元测试,特别是针对关键功能如
handleInsert
和handleCopy
。- 考虑使用 React 的
memo
来优化性能,特别是对于一些可能经常重新渲染的组件。
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4084 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 54.38% 54.38% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 1591 1591
Lines 97335 97335
Branches 19916 19916
==========================================
- Hits 52939 52932 -7
- Misses 36870 36876 +6
- Partials 7526 7527 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
/backport to v3.4 |
Backporting to |
Types
Background or solution
Changelog
fix:修复Ai report在Chat面板插入生成代码时actionType错误的问题
Summary by CodeRabbit