Fixes OpenSearchISMPolicy crd kind in docs

[jojovem]

Minor typo fix for the OpenSearchISMPolicy kind

Description

Minor typo fix for the OpenSearchISMPolicy kind

[jojovem]

I dont know what is the pattern for CRD naming, but they are using capital S in some and lower case in others:

• OpensearchActionGroup
• OpenSearchCluster
• OpensearchComponentTemplate
• OpensearchIndexTemplate
• OpenSearchISMPolicy
• OpensearchRole
• OpensearchTenant
• OpensearchUserRoleBinding
• OpensearchUser

[salyh]

I would vote for capital 'S' like in OpenSearchISMPolicy for all new CRDs, and then, with the next major release, change all the other CRDs to also be camel cased (as a breaking change). Wdyt @idanl21 @dbason @swoehrl-mw @prudhvigodithi @jochenkressin @pchmielnik

[pchmielnik]

I would vote for capital 'S' like in OpenSearchISMPolicy for all new CRDs, and then, with the next major release, change all the other CRDs to also be camel cased (as a breaking change). Wdyt @idanl21 @dbason @swoehrl-mw @prudhvigodithi @jochenkressin @pchmielnik

I like the idea of using a capital 'S'. This approach promotes consistency and clarity in naming conventions, which is beneficial for long-term maintenance and usability.

[prudhvigodithi]

I would go for capital S and once merged I assume this would be a breaking change for folks who have applied OpensearchISMPolicy right ?

[prudhvigodithi]

Should we push this change to v2.6.0 #776 release?
WDYT @idanl21 @dbason @swoehrl-mw @prudhvigodithi @jochenkressin @pchmielnik @bbarani

[swoehrl-mw]

@prudhvigodithi

I would go for capital S and once merged I assume this would be a breaking change for folks who have applied OpensearchISMPolicy right ?

This PR is only a doc change, in the code the capital S is already correct, so no breaking change. That also means it makes no difference if it is merged before or after the release.

[prudhvigodithi]

Thanks then can we go ahead with the PR?