Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade nodemailer from 2.7.2 to 3.0.0 #15

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

liorkesos
Copy link
Member

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
medium severity 596/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.5
Arbitrary Code Injection
SNYK-JS-UNDERSCORE-1080984
Yes Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: nodemailer The new version differs by 4 commits.
  • eaef3b5 Merge pull request #719 from nodemailer/v3.0.0
  • de5b6f6 updated license
  • 652ad8e Do not use PRO in name
  • 6218b8d Setup files for EUPL licensed v3.0.0

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Arbitrary Code Injection

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-UNDERSCORE-1080984
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants