Skip to content

jyyy03/IP_TCP

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

1 Commit
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

TCP

Directory Structure

├── cmd                         -- source code for executables
│   ├── vhost
│   ├── vrouter
├── pkg
│   ├── proto
│   │   ├── ippacket.go
│   │   ├── tcppacket.go
│   │   ├── rip.go
│   ├── ipnode
│   │   ├── ipstack.go             -- shared structs & functions among routers & hosts
│   │   ├── ip_print.go
│   │   ├── ip_internal.go
│   │   ├── ip_repl.go
│   ├── tcpstack
│   │   ├── tcpstack.go         -- initialization & general APIs
│   │   ├── tcp_internal.go 	
│   │   ├── conn.go             -- normal socket related APIs & functions
│   │   ├── listener.go         -- listener socket related APIs & functions
│   │   ├── state.go            -- state machine
│   │   ├── state_internal.go 
│   │   ├── retransmission.go 
│   │   ├── sendbuf.go      
│   │   ├── recvbuf.go      
│   │   ├── priorityqueue.go 
│   │   ├── tcp_repl.go         
│   │   ├── tcp_print.go  
│   │   ├── utils.go  
│   ├── repl					-- common repl pkg
│   ├── vhost					-- vhost specific logics
│   ├── vrouter					-- vrouter specific logics
│   ├── lnxconfig               -- parser for .lnx file
├── util
│   ├── rip-dissector           -- for wireshark to decode messages in RIP protocols
│   ├── vnet_generate			-- generate .lnx from .json
│   ├── vnet_run				-- spawn tmux session
│   ├── gen_testfile.py			-- for generating files of certain size
└── reference                   -- reference programs

Performance

Measure the time to send a file (roughly 3M) over non-lossy link

Reference

The reference always takes 1.3s

Our sender & receiver

Under ideal situation, it generally takes 0.8s (because we're sending more data in each segment than the reference).

When there's zero window (when the receiver slows down), it takes much longer. The longest time observed was around 30s.

  • seems to occur more frequently when testing sf, rf multiple times in a row

When testing our sender against reference receiver, or our receiver against reference sender:

  • when no Zero Window occurred, it took 0.6~0.8s
  • when Zero Window occurred only once (with reference receiver), it took roughly 5s

Packet Capture

1 megabyte file transmission between two of your nodes. To do this, run two of your nodes in the ABC network with the lossy node in the middle, configured with a 2% drop rate.

Reference receiver & our sender

  • One example segment sent and acknowledged
  • One segment that is retransmitted
  • Connection teardown

Reference sender & our receiver

Took too long to run... also frequently reached maximum transmissions and exited.

(After 100+ seconds, still asking for seg 62465 & transferring seg 126976. Not sure why.)

Our sender & receiver

Same as above.

Notes

Some Design Choice:

  1. RFC 9293 seems to suggest each segment on the retransmission queue should have its own timeout. We're not sure how to implement that since we're only using one timer, and we're not updating the sent time of a segment due to retransmissions.

  2. Currently send buffer / receive buffer related variables (SND.NXT, etc.) are implemented as atomics while also being protected by a general mutex conn.mu. The reason is "specifically when calculating usable send window, we want to ensure serializability between reading SND.UNA & SND.WND and modifying SND.UNA & SND.WND". It does feel a bit redundant.

Other Known Bugs

When testing sending 3MB fileover non-lossy link:

  1. retransmission.go L37: meta.packet.TcpHeader.SeqNum+meta.length sometimes reports nil pointer deref. Not sure why since all packet pushed onto the queue shouldn't be nil. Unable to consistently reproduce.

  2. Sometimes rf hangs in CLOSE_WAIT. Probably got stuck in recvbuf.Read(). Not sure why.

  3. Have absolutely no idea what this is all about. Seems very wrong starting from packet 4794. The received file was fine though.

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published