Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(no-callback-in-promise): add timeoutsErr option #514

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

brettz9
Copy link
Member

@brettz9 brettz9 commented Jul 25, 2024

What is the purpose of this pull request?

  • Bug fix
  • Changes an existing rule

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (bbcfcbf) to head (cee71eb).
Report is 39 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #514   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           25        26    +1     
  Lines          649       711   +62     
  Branches       250       277   +27     
=========================================
+ Hits           649       711   +62     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@scagood

This comment was marked as resolved.

@brettz9

This comment was marked as resolved.

@scagood

This comment was marked as resolved.

@brettz9

This comment was marked as resolved.

…t-community#167

Also:
- fix(`no-callback-in-promise`): ensure timeouts do not err (by default); fixes eslint-community#220
@brettz9 brettz9 force-pushed the no-callback-in-promise-timeouts branch from 6b3dce6 to cee71eb Compare July 30, 2024 03:03
@brettz9

This comment was marked as resolved.

@scagood

This comment was marked as resolved.

Copy link
Contributor

@scagood scagood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

@brettz9 brettz9 requested a review from a team October 16, 2024 18:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

no-callback-in-promise use cases no-callback-in-promise misses callback passed as argument
2 participants