Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{chem}[GCC/12.3.0] CPPE v0.3.3a0 #21647

Conversation

PetrKralCZ
Copy link
Collaborator

@PetrKralCZ PetrKralCZ commented Oct 15, 2024

(created using eb --new-pr)

  • Unlike previous version (0.3.1), this version does not generate any libcppe.so.

@PetrKralCZ
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

easyblock = 'CMakeMake'

name = 'CPPE'
version = '0.3.3a0'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@PetrKralCZ This is a pre-release, I'm not sure it's wise to use this already...

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I also have a 0.3.1 version ready. Should I open PR for that one?


builddependencies = [
('CMake', '3.26.3'),
('pybind11', '2.11.1'),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This may need to be a runtime dependency, see also #21564 (I need to verify whether that actually makes sense)

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@PetrKralCZ: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=21647 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_21647 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 14471

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2413317932 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/28bf05ff4c6a417ace524ed0da32ddac for a full test report.

@PetrKralCZ
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@PetrKralCZ: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=21647 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_21647 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 5075

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2413339753 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/f9014f51ecf9cc99b94ea8344deb5330 for a full test report.

@PetrKralCZ
Copy link
Collaborator Author

We don't want to use an apha version, co closing this in favor 0.3.1. #21750
The 0.3.2 version is broken and has no new features/fixes, see maxscheurer/cppe#45)

@PetrKralCZ PetrKralCZ closed this Oct 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants