Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix inverse Fourier transform naming #178

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024
Merged

Fix inverse Fourier transform naming #178

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024

Conversation

sdahdah
Copy link
Member

@sdahdah sdahdah commented Sep 26, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Resolves #175

Proposed Changes

  • Rename kernel_or_ift to kernel_or_ft
  • Split MOSEK and non-MOSEK tests
  • Remove deprecated predict_multistep()

Checklist

  • Write unit tests
  • Add new estimators to existing scikit-learn compatibility tests
  • Write examples in docstrings
  • Update Sphinx documentation
  • Bump version number and date in setup.py, CITATION.cff, and
    README.rst

@sdahdah sdahdah added the bug Something isn't working label Sep 26, 2024
@sdahdah sdahdah self-assigned this Sep 26, 2024
@sdahdah sdahdah linked an issue Sep 26, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Fix "inverse" Fourier transform in parameters and docs of RFF lifting functions #175
Closed
@sdahdah sdahdah merged commit 8c798d6 into main Sep 26, 2024
7 checks passed
@sdahdah sdahdah deleted the bugfix/175-fix-inverse-fourier-transform-in-parameters-and-docs-of-rff-lifting-functions branch September 26, 2024 18:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@sdahdah sdahdah

Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix "inverse" Fourier transform in parameters and docs of RFF lifting functions
1 participant
@sdahdah