Fix bug in data copy name

[tomvanmele]

What type of change is this?

• Bug fix in a backwards-compatible manner.
• New feature in a backwards-compatible manner.
• Breaking change: bug fix or new feature that involve incompatible API changes.
• Other (e.g. doc update, configuration, etc)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

• I added a line to the CHANGELOG.md file in the Unreleased section under the most fitting heading (e.g. Added, Changed, Removed).
• I ran all tests on my computer and it's all green (i.e. invoke test).
• I ran lint on my computer and there are no errors (i.e. invoke lint).
• I added new functions/classes and made them available on a second-level import, e.g. compas.datastructures.Mesh.
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
• I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 60.68%. Comparing base (166ac9d) to head (c194626).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/compas/data/data.py	66.66%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1403      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.70%   60.68%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         207      207              
  Lines       22265    22266       +1     
==========================================
- Hits        13515    13512       -3     
- Misses       8750     8754       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Licini]

Perhaps you need to assign a name in your test before copying the object, in order the cover Line294. Otherwise it is just None, right?

[tomvanmele]

the problem does not arise when a name is assigned, but when there isn't. when no name is assigned, the name attribute is not included in the serialisation info. however, (before this PR) when a copy is made the name attribute is assigned regardless. this means that the serialised info before and after copy don't match. that is what this PR fixes. the test as written, would have failed before this PR...