fix: payment amount #63
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes primarily involve updates to the handling of payment data across multiple components and utility functions. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/lib/utils.ts (1)
Line range hint
52-66: Approved: Improved error handling in calculateShortPaymentReference.The addition of error handling in the
calculateShortPaymentReferencefunction is a good improvement. It makes the function more robust by catching and logging any errors that occur during the calculation of the payment reference.For consistency with the rest of the codebase, consider using an arrow function:
export const calculateShortPaymentReference = ( requestId: string, salt: string, address: string ): `0x${string}` | undefined => { try { return `0x${PaymentReferenceCalculator.calculate(requestId, salt, address)}`; } catch (error) { console.error('Error calculating short payment reference', error); return undefined; } };This maintains the coding style used in other functions within the file.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/components/payment-table.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/transactions-and-payments-table.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/lib/utils.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/components/transactions-and-payments-table.tsx (3)
113-113: LGTM: Change aligns with PR objectivesThis modification addresses the issue described in the PR objectives by using
item?.amountInCryptoinstead ofitem?.amount. This change should resolve the discrepancies in the payment balance amount during conversion payments, as intended.
Line range hint
1-138: Overall impact: Improved payment amount accuracyThe change to use
amountInCryptofor payment items improves the accuracy of displayed payment amounts without affecting other component functionality. This localized modification aligns well with the PR objectives and doesn't introduce any apparent side effects.
Line range hint
1-138: Verify consistent usage ofamountInCryptofor paymentsTo ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify that
amountInCryptois used for payment amounts in other relevant files.Run the following script to check for usage of
amountandamountInCryptoin payment-related contexts:This script will help identify any potential inconsistencies in how payment amounts are handled across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Run the following script to check for usage of
amountandamountInCryptoin payment-related contexts:This updated script specifies the relevant file extensions directly, ensuring that the search targets TypeScript and JavaScript files without relying on the '--type' flag. It also excludes test files to focus the search on production code.
Consistent usage of
amountInCryptofor payments verified across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of 'amount' and 'amountInCrypto' in payment-related contexts echo "Searching for 'amount' usage in payment contexts:" rg --type typescript --type javascript 'amount.*payment' -g '!*test*' echo "\nSearching for 'amountInCrypto' usage:" rg --type typescript --type javascript 'amountInCrypto' -g '!*test*'Length of output: 420
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of 'amount' and 'amountInCrypto' in payment-related contexts echo "Searching for 'amount' usage in payment contexts:" rg 'amount.*payment' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.js' -g '*.jsx' -g '!.test.*' echo "\nSearching for 'amountInCrypto' usage:" rg 'amountInCrypto' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.js' -g '*.jsx' -g '!.test.*'Length of output: 768
src/lib/utils.ts (1)
Line range hint
52-66: Verify usage of modified functions across the codebase.The changes to
getBalanceandcalculateShortPaymentReferencefunctions may have implications for other parts of the codebase. Please ensure that:
- All usages of
getBalanceare updated to handle the new balance calculation based onamountInCrypto.- Any code calling
calculateShortPaymentReferenceis prepared to handle the potentialundefinedreturn value.To assist in this verification, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify all occurrences of these functions, allowing you to manually verify that they are being used correctly with the new changes.
Also applies to: 174-177
src/components/payment-table.tsx (1)
98-102: LGTM! Verify impact on dependent code.The change from
amounttoamountInCryptoaligns with the PR objectives and should resolve the payment balance amount issues. Good job on implementing this fix.To ensure this change doesn't introduce unintended side effects, please run the following script to check for any other occurrences of
amountthat might need updating:This will help identify any other places in the codebase that might be affected by this change.
✅ Verification successful
Impact Verified on Dependent Code.
After reviewing the occurrences of
amountandamountInCryptoacross the codebase, the change inpayment-table.tsxis correctly scoped. All instances whereamountwas replaced withamountInCryptoare consistent with the PR objectives. No unintended side effects were found in other parts of the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for other occurrences of 'amount' in the codebase that might need updating # Test: Search for 'amount' in TypeScript and JavaScript files rg --type-add 'web:*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}' --type web -i '\bamount\b' -C 3Length of output: 5246
| .map((payment) => BigInt(payment.amountInCrypto)) | ||
| .reduce((a, b) => a + b, BigInt(0)) | ||
| : 0; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Approved: Change addresses the payment balance issue.
The modification to use payment.amountInCrypto instead of payment.amount aligns with the PR objective of fixing the payment balance amount during conversion payments. This change should correctly handle converted cryptocurrency amounts.
Consider enhancing readability by using a named function for the reducer:
export const getBalance = (payments: Payment[] | undefined) => {
const sumAmounts = (total: bigint, payment: Payment) => total + BigInt(payment.amountInCrypto);
return payments ? payments.reduce(sumAmounts, BigInt(0)) : BigInt(0);
};This approach makes the logic more explicit and easier to understand at a glance.
Fixes:
Changes:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Improvements