Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][FIX] web_advanced_search: Fixed changes from code editor not propagated #2964

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

chienandalu
Copy link
Member

Propagate changes in the debug mode domain editor to the domain itself.

cc @Tecnativa TT51315

please review @CarlosRoca13 @carlosdauden

Propagate changes in the debug mode domain editor to the domain itself.

TT51315
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ivantodorovich,
some modules you are maintaining are being modified, check this out!

Copy link
Contributor

@CarlosRoca13 CarlosRoca13 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code review 👍

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza added this to the 16.0 milestone Oct 16, 2024
Copy link
Member

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/ocabot merge patch

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

On my way to merge this fine PR!
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-2964-by-pedrobaeza-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit ee0e6b3 into OCA:16.0 Oct 16, 2024
7 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 95bf1c6. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Copy link

@carlosdauden carlosdauden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok to this PR.
Only comment that the "add new value" option does not work correctly, I understand that this problem is different from the one solved by this PR and that functionally it is not important because the only way to use the "in" operator is using the debug mode.

But as I have detected it in my functional review, I leave it commented.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants