Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci(parallel): skip test_par_gwf02 cases d-f, no xdist on windows #1960

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 24, 2024

Conversation

wpbonelli
Copy link
Contributor

Skip the slowest parallel test cases on Windows CI. Also don't use xdist to avoid unwanted oversubscription (though we deliberately oversubscribe in the test cases themselves).

TODO: re-enable all autotests for parallel test job, rather than only parallel tests, since we want to make sure the parallel build doesn't regress any serial functionality.

xref actions/runner-images#7320 where many others have reported inexplicably slow Windows runners


Checklist of items for pull request

  • Replaced section above with description of pull request
  • Addresses Slow Windows parallel CI tests #1955
  • Added new test or modified an existing test
  • Removed checklist items not relevant to this pull request

@wpbonelli wpbonelli marked this pull request as ready for review July 23, 2024 21:56
@wpbonelli
Copy link
Contributor Author

Parallel build failed the serial tests on Windows CI for some reason, @mjr-deltares could not reproduce locally. Will merge so this speeds things up for now and come back to the CI failure

@wpbonelli wpbonelli merged commit 4a14870 into MODFLOW-USGS:develop Jul 24, 2024
20 checks passed
@wpbonelli wpbonelli deleted the par-test branch July 24, 2024 01:05
wpbonelli added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2024
Follow up on #1960. Run the serial tests to make sure the parallel build doesn't break any serial functionality.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants