Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

revert AbstractTriangular -> UpperLowerTriangular on released versions #150

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

jishnub
Copy link
Member

@jishnub jishnub commented Jul 13, 2023

This should resolve the current breakages

@jishnub jishnub requested a review from dlfivefifty July 13, 2023 13:57
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 13, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 76.92% and project coverage change: -7.87 ⚠️

Comparison is base (a7786a0) 86.49% compared to head (96aeda3) 78.62%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #150      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.49%   78.62%   -7.87%     
==========================================
  Files          10       10              
  Lines        1740     1703      -37     
==========================================
- Hits         1505     1339     -166     
- Misses        235      364     +129     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/ldiv.jl 79.81% <ø> (-10.02%) ⬇️
src/mul.jl 77.31% <50.00%> (-4.59%) ⬇️
src/ArrayLayouts.jl 78.16% <100.00%> (-3.97%) ⬇️
src/memorylayout.jl 81.03% <100.00%> (-3.16%) ⬇️
src/triangular.jl 81.52% <100.00%> (-14.86%) ⬇️

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@jishnub
Copy link
Member Author

jishnub commented Jul 18, 2023

Gentle bump @dlfivefifty

@@ -52,13 +52,10 @@ else
const CNoPivot = NoPivot
end

if VERSION ≥ v"1.11.0-DEV.21"
using LinearAlgebra: UpperOrLowerTriangular
@static if VERSION ≥ v"1.11.0-DEV.21"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For testing purposes, could you try

Suggested change
@static if VERSION v"1.11.0-DEV.21"
@static if VERSION v"1.10-"

and then revert? What's the breakage actually? Is it that some packages need AbstractTriangular beyond UpperOrLowerTriangular?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It caused a bunch of ambiguities but these have been fixed downstream. I’m not sure it’s worth merging this anymore

@dlfivefifty
Copy link
Member

I think the ship has sailed on this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants