petsc 3.22.0

[MarDiehl]

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

---

[MarDiehl]

Note: Due to compiler version mismatches (I have gcc14 installed which seems to be picked up by homebrew, but tests/MPI expect gcc-11), the tests fail on my system.

[MarDiehl]

I'm a little bit surprised about the failing "Commit style" check. Not including petsc-complex.rb also gives a warning because petsc and petsc-complex are out of sync.

[MarDiehl]

@oldsharp: I believe this is interesting for you.

Note that both formulas deviate a little, # Avoid references to cellar paths. is missing in the complex variant. Also, there is a small difference in the path used for testing.

The differences are easy to see using diff or similar tools.