Check for and update outdated integrations #4694
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ | ||
| name: Outdated Integrations | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. 🟠 Code VulnerabilityNo explicit permissions set for at the workflow level (...read more)Check the permissions granted to jobsDatadog’s GitHub organization defines default permissions for the Your repository may require different setup, but please consider defining permissions for each job following the least privilege principle to restrict the impact of a possible compromission. You can find the list of all possible permissions in Workflow syntax for GitHub Actions - GitHub Docs. Please note they can be defined at the job or the workflow level.
|
||
|
|
||
| on: | ||
| schedule: | ||
| # This, will run every weekday at 2pm UTC | ||
| - cron: '0 14 * * 1,2,3,4,5' | ||
|
|
||
| jobs: | ||
| outdated-integrations: | ||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| steps: | ||
| - uses: actions/checkout@v4 | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. 🟠 Code VulnerabilityWorkflow depends on a GitHub actions pinned by tag (...read more)Pin third party actions by hash, or at least by tag for trusted sourcesWhen using a third party action, one needs to provide its GitHub path ( No pinned git ref means the action will use the latest commit of the default branch each time it runs, eventually running newer versions of the code that were not audited by Datadog. Specifying a git tag is better, but since they are not immutable, using a full length hash is recommended to make sure the action content is actually frozen to some reviewed state. Be careful however, as even pinning an action by hash can be circumvented by attackers still. For instance, if an action relies on a Docker image which is itself not pinned to a digest, it becomes possible to alter its behaviour through the Docker image without actually changing its hash. You can learn more about this kind of attacks in Unpinnable Actions: How Malicious Code Can Sneak into Your GitHub Actions Workflows. Pinning actions by hash is still a good first line of defense against supply chain attacks. Additionally, pinning by hash or tag means the action won’t benefit from newer version updates if any, including eventual security patches. Make sure to regularly check if newer versions for an action you use are available. For actions coming from a very trustworthy source, it can make sense to use a laxer pinning policy to benefit from updates as soon as possible.
There was a problem hiding this comment. 🟠 Code VulnerabilityWorkflow depends on a GitHub actions pinned by tag (...read more)Pin third party actions by hash, or at least by tag for trusted sourcesWhen using a third party action, one needs to provide its GitHub path ( No pinned git ref means the action will use the latest commit of the default branch each time it runs, eventually running newer versions of the code that were not audited by Datadog. Specifying a git tag is better, but since they are not immutable, using a full length hash is recommended to make sure the action content is actually frozen to some reviewed state. Be careful however, as even pinning an action by hash can be circumvented by attackers still. For instance, if an action relies on a Docker image which is itself not pinned to a digest, it becomes possible to alter its behaviour through the Docker image without actually changing its hash. You can learn more about this kind of attacks in Unpinnable Actions: How Malicious Code Can Sneak into Your GitHub Actions Workflows. Pinning actions by hash is still a good first line of defense against supply chain attacks. Additionally, pinning by hash or tag means the action won’t benefit from newer version updates if any, including eventual security patches. Make sure to regularly check if newer versions for an action you use are available. For actions coming from a very trustworthy source, it can make sense to use a laxer pinning policy to benefit from updates as soon as possible.
|
||
| - uses: ./.github/actions/node/setup | ||
| - run: yarn install | ||
| - run: yarn outdated-integrations | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟠 Code Vulnerability
No explicit permissions set for at the workflow level (...read more)
Check the permissions granted to jobs
Datadog’s GitHub organization defines default permissions for the
GITHUB_TOKENto be restricted (contents:read,metadata:readandpackages:read).Your repository may require different setup, but please consider defining permissions for each job following the least privilege principle to restrict the impact of a possible compromission.
You can find the list of all possible permissions in Workflow syntax for GitHub Actions - GitHub Docs. Please note they can be defined at the job or the workflow level.