Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

OStreamWrapper and IStreamWrapper need to have << and >> defined for basic types. #304

Open
Algomorph opened this issue Jan 3, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

OStreamWrapper and IStreamWrapper need to have << and >> defined for basic types. #304

Algomorph opened this issue Jan 3, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
ease-of-maintenance Resolving this issue would significantly improve ease of maintenance and future development. enhancement

Comments

@Algomorph
Copy link
Owner

  1. OStreamWrapper and IStreamWrapper need to have << and >> operators defined for basic and primitive types, such as int, float, double, string, etc.
  2. They should probably also be renamed to something more generic yet descriptive, e.g. BinaryOstream and BinaryIstream or DataOstream and DataIstream or the like. Think about this. Note that compression is possible but optional.
@Algomorph Algomorph added ease-of-maintenance Resolving this issue would significantly improve ease of maintenance and future development. ease-of-use Issues that, if resolved, would significantly ease usage / experiments enhancement and removed ease-of-use Issues that, if resolved, would significantly ease usage / experiments labels Jan 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ease-of-maintenance Resolving this issue would significantly improve ease of maintenance and future development. enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Algomorph