Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
56 lines (44 loc) · 1.58 KB

evaluation_criteria.md

File metadata and controls

56 lines (44 loc) · 1.58 KB

Evaluation Criteria

Application Quality

  • Well formed
  • Makes sense
  • Detailed and complete

Budget Quality

  • Well formed
  • Makes sense
  • Detailed and complete

Roadmap Alignment

  • Part of the 2019 roadmap?
  • Will it help us meet 2019 goals?
  • Have we already funded similar projects?

Alignment with Foundation's Mission

  • Does the project align with our values and mission?

Sustainability

  • Does the project have a sustainability plan after funding runs out?
  • How long do they expected to be funded for?

Impact

  • Will this project have a large impact on the ecosystem?
  • Does our $$ accelerate the project?

Risk

  • Are the risks of investing in this project high
  • Types of risk: legal or regulatory risks, reputational risk, operational/management risk etc.

Conflict of Interest

  • Are the conflicts of interest of investing in this project large?

Are you excited about this project?

  • Would you blog about it in an exciting way?

Technical Due Diligence (Team Quality / Track Record)

  • Has the team delivered before?
  • Are they determined/motivated?
  • Do they have the competence/skills to deliver?
  • Evaluate the github/past projects of each applicant
  • Are the claims made in the application valid?
  • Is it easily testable?
  • How will the deliverables be assessed?

Recommendation to the Board of Management

  • Fund
  • Fund w/ amendments
  • More info required
  • Do not fund

Board of Management recommendation to the Foundation Council

  • Strategic Recommendation - Why is this Project Aligned with the ICF Vision?
  • Technical Recommendation - Can this project deliver?