Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS + SCRAM-SHA-224(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-384(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA3-512(-PLUS) supports #30

Closed
Neustradamus opened this issue Mar 26, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@Neustradamus
Copy link

Neustradamus commented Mar 26, 2020

After:

  • SCRAM-SHA-1

Can you add supports of :

  • SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS
  • SCRAM-SHA-224
  • SCRAM-SHA-224-PLUS
  • SCRAM-SHA-256
  • SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS
  • SCRAM-SHA-384
  • SCRAM-SHA-384-PLUS
  • SCRAM-SHA-512
  • SCRAM-SHA-512-PLUS
  • SCRAM-SHA3-512
  • SCRAM-SHA3-512-PLUS

"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802]".

https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/hash-recommendations.html

-PLUS variants:

LDAP:

  • RFC5803: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Schema for Storing Salted: Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) Secrets: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5803

HTTP:

2FA:

IANA:

Linked to:

@Neustradamus Neustradamus changed the title Add support for SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS, SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS) SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS + SCRAM-SHA-224(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-384(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA3-512(-PLUS) supports Nov 12, 2020
Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 25, 2021

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants