Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
44 lines (33 loc) · 2.94 KB

2019-january.md

File metadata and controls

44 lines (33 loc) · 2.94 KB
Raw

January 2019

Tech

Secure Interaction Design and the Principle of Least Authority

Paper

  • Design principles:
    1. Path of Least Resistance: The most natural way to do any task should also be the most secure way.
    2. Appropriate Boundaries: The interface should expose, and the system should enforce, distinctions between objects and between actions along boundaries that matter to the user.
    3. Explicit Authorization: A user’s authorities must only be provided to other actors as a result of an explicit user action that is understood to imply granting.
    4. Visibility: The interface should allow the user to easily review any active actors and authority relationships that would affect security-relevant decisions.
    5. Revocability: The interface should allow the user to easily revoke authorities that the user has granted, wherever revocation is possible.
    6. Expected Ability: The interface must not give the user the impression that it is possible to do something that cannot actually be done.
    7. Trusted Path: The interface must provide an unspoofable and faithful communication channel between the user and any entity trusted to manipulate authorities on the user’s behalf.
    8. Identifiability: The interface should enforce that distinct objects and distinct actions have unspoofably identifiable and distinguishable representations.
    9. Expressiveness: The interface should provide enough expressive power (a) to describe a safe security policy without undue difficulty; and (b) to allow users to express security policies in terms that fit their goals.
    10. Clarity: The effect of any security-relevant action must be clearly apparent to the user before the action is taken.

Enter the Crypto Idea Maze

Article

  • Theses:
    • Sound money: “Trustless money” that cannot be inflated by any trusted authority such as a central bank.
    • Web3: “Trustless internet” where Internet architecture is free of trusted centralized data & service monopolies. Users have more control over their data and Internet usage. These networks also compensate participants for economic value generated in the network.
    • Open finance: “Trustless financial systems” that extend cryptocurrency to provide open software primitives for equities, debt, derivatives, checking accounts, remittances, work contracts, retirement accounts, property etc.
  • Features are not inherently valuable; they're only useful in the context of a user need
    • Each of the theses have their own, diverging users
    • What does success for a product / feature mean?
    • What is its next best alternative? And how much worse is this alternative?
    • If critical mass is necessary, is there any value before reaching that point?
  • Ethos-requiring products will only get so far without a compelling case for ethos-neutral people (i.e. most people)

Life

Random