-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 177
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ruby ten times slower as a global command #2343
Comments
Awesome, thank you for the benchmark! We are actually currently working on a slightly adjusted way of launching the executables. The new way caches the activation variables and so it should be faster. This will be helpful. cc @nichmor maybe you can run this locally? |
It does seem this might just be lots of conda cruft:
If I comment out lines 4-7 then
|
Benchmarks results using new way of launching executables:
I think by switching to the new way of launching them we will avoid this slow problem |
Checks
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pixi, using
pixi --version
.Reproducible example
Issue description
Running
ruby
results in 355ms time vs. 29.6ms when run from the enviroment bin directory directly. Python for comparison shows roughly the same performance.Expected behavior
Ruby should be the same speed no matter where it is run from...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: