-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is RQL still a valid choice in 2022? #85
Comments
NO. |
Thank you, having a standard way to encode a complex query in a url, could have been great. Anyway... |
IMHO, one should not expose DB as rest. DB is not a microservice itself, but a part of microservice. |
I love the simplicity and the possibility to add RQL queries to a URL.
Of course it would be nicer if RQL would be a standard, but we can live without it being one.
And we added 2 more predicates not defined in the original RQL:
So my suggestion would be to make your own conclusions whether or not RQL is useful for you. Here is yet another adoption of RQL I found "in the wild": https://connect.cloudblue.com/community/developers/api/rql/ So it is definitely used, however more tooling/libraries and a more "official" standard would of course be great to have. |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: