You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If awarded, the anti-displacement project will start in Fall 2022. In the anti-displacement project*, we have to identify areas** at-risk of Project Connect rail displacement.
*Project is in partnership with YWCA
**Area granularity to the “mailing addresses” level
Problem
We don’t know how to identify areas at-risk of Project Connect rail displacement. The city has made a displacement risk map, but the city’s map has a very binary evaluation of “at risk” — a neighborhood is either “at risk” or “not at risk.” There’s no nuance in-between.
Solution
In no particular order:
Identify the calculations and datasets that inform city’s displacement risk map
Identify established
transportation equity factors
displacement factors
Identify how to correlate this info into a working model
Acceptance criteria
A description of a data model that measures displacement risk (maybe formula?)
A rudimentary roadmap in order to create the data model (following the now/next/later framework)
Context
If awarded, the anti-displacement project will start in Fall 2022. In the anti-displacement project*, we have to identify areas** at-risk of Project Connect rail displacement.
*Project is in partnership with YWCA
**Area granularity to the “mailing addresses” level
Problem
We don’t know how to identify areas at-risk of Project Connect rail displacement. The city has made a displacement risk map, but the city’s map has a very binary evaluation of “at risk” — a neighborhood is either “at risk” or “not at risk.” There’s no nuance in-between.
Solution
In no particular order:
Acceptance criteria
Reference info
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: