Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[new release] bam (3 packages) (0.3) #26787

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2024

Conversation

francoisthire
Copy link

@francoisthire francoisthire commented Oct 25, 2024

A property-based testing library with internal shrinking

CHANGES:

@francoisthire francoisthire force-pushed the release-bam-v0.3 branch 7 times, most recently from 4a71ee9 to a3daa17 Compare October 27, 2024 19:08
synopsis: "A PPX deriving generators for OCaml types"
description:
"Provides a way to automatically get generators for a given type"
maintainer: ["François Thiré"]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would you mind adding a contact email here, and in the other packages? E.g.,

maintainer: ["François Thiré" <your.email@mail.server>]

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

CHANGES:

- Fix a file descriptor leak (francoisthire/bam#8)

- More control over the computation of statistics (francoisthire/bam#8)

- Fix a typing regression with OCaml 5.2 (francoisthire/bam#8)

- Update the dependencies to be compatible with OCaml 5.2 (francoisthire/bam#11)
  (Thanks @mathiasbourgoin, @matthiasdrp)
@shonfeder shonfeder merged commit 924ed62 into ocaml:master Oct 28, 2024
3 checks passed
@shonfeder
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for publishing the updates to these packages! Please consider announcing them on discuss.ocaml.org :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants