Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stubgen: Explain what "Trustfall invariants" we're testing in emitted test code #578

Open
obi1kenobi opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
A-adapter Area: plugging data sources into the interpreter A-docs Area: documentation for the query language or library APIs C-enhancement Category: raise the bar on expectations E-easy Call for participation: experience needed to fix: easy / not much (good first issue) E-help-wanted Call for participation: help is requested to fix this issue.

Comments

@obi1kenobi
Copy link
Owner

It isn't obvious what is and is not being tested here. Consider emitting a comment in the generated code that explains what is being tested there.

@obi1kenobi obi1kenobi added A-adapter Area: plugging data sources into the interpreter A-docs Area: documentation for the query language or library APIs E-help-wanted Call for participation: help is requested to fix this issue. E-easy Call for participation: experience needed to fix: easy / not much (good first issue) C-enhancement Category: raise the bar on expectations labels Mar 19, 2024
@devshDotTech

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@obi1kenobi

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@devshDotTech

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-adapter Area: plugging data sources into the interpreter A-docs Area: documentation for the query language or library APIs C-enhancement Category: raise the bar on expectations E-easy Call for participation: experience needed to fix: easy / not much (good first issue) E-help-wanted Call for participation: help is requested to fix this issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants