This document is intended to help consolidate the practices we are using to develop and maintain Cats. Its primary audience is Cats maintainers who may need to close issues, merge PRs, do releases, or understand how these things work.
Pull requests currently require two sign-offs from Cats maintainers. Community member sign-offs are appreciated as votes of confidence but don't usually count toward this total unless the commenter has already been involved with the area of code in question.
When fixing typos or improving documentation only one sign-off is required (although for major edits waiting for two may be preferable).
For serious emergencies or work on the build which can't easily be reviewed or tested, pushing directly to master may be OK (but is definitely not encouraged). In these cases it's best to comment in Gitter or elsewhere about what happened and what was done.
If a release is simply a bug fix, increment the patch version number (e.g. 1.2.3 becomes 1.2.4). These releases may happen quite quickly in response to reported bugs or problems, and should usually be source and binary compatible.
If the major version is 0, then the minor version should be updated (e.g. 0.2.3 becomes 0.3.0). There are no compatibility guarantees for this type of change.
If the major version is 1 or greater, then significant additions should increment the minor version number (e.g. 1.2.3 becomes 1.3.0) and breaking or incompatible changes should increment the major number (e.g. 1.2.3 becomes 2.0.0). These major version bumps should only occur after substantial review, warning, and with proper deprecation cycles.
Before the release, the tests and other validation must be passing.
Currently, the best way to release cats is:
- Run
+ clean
to ensure a clean start. - Run
+ package
to ensure everything builds. - Run
release
, which will validate tests/code, etc.
(Eventually release
should do all of these things but for now the
individual steps are necessary.)
You will need to enter a GPG password to sign the artifacts correctly, and you will also need to have Sonatype credentials to publish the artifacts. The release process should take care of everything, including releasing the artifacts on Sonatype.
If the Sonatype publishing fails, but the artifacts were uploaded, you
can finish the release manually using the Sonatype web site. In that
case you will also need to do git push --tags origin master
to push
the new version's tags.
(In the future we may want to create branches for major versions,
e.g. v1.x
. For now we don't have these.)
The release will take a few hours to sync to Maven Central. It's usually better to hold off announcing the release until this sync has happened. (Before the sync, users may not be able to resolve the new version.)
After the release occurs, you will need to update the documentation. Here is a list of the places that will definitely need to be updated:
docs/src/site/index.md
: update version numbersREADME.md
: update version numbersAUTHORS.md
: add new contributorsCHANGES.md
: summarize changes since last release
(Other changes may be necessary, especially for large releases.)
You can get a list of changes between release tags v0.1.2
and
v0.2.0
via git log v0.1.2..v0.2.0
. Scanning this list of commit
messages is a good way to get a summary of what happened, although it
does not account for conversations that occured on Github.
Once the relevant documentation changes have been committed, new release notes should be added. You can add a release by clicking the "Draft a new release" button on that page, or if the relevant release already exists, you can click "Edit release".
The website should then be updated via sbt-microsites
using sbt docs/publishMicrosite
.
Please check the prerequisites of sbt-microsites.
Ideally this document will evolve and grow as the project matures. Pull requests to add sections explaining how maintenance occurs (or should occur) are very welcome.