Update bottom part of README

[fool]

still mentions wrong things about the old PhantomJS implementation

[fool]

not sure if y'all want to take on docs for these kinds of repos, @klavavej , so feel free to remove from your project if not.

[klavavej]

@fool - we would consider issues for these kinds of repos if they were high priority. Since this is low priority I'm going to remove it from our board.

[fool]

Yup, hard to consider this one high priority. Guess I'll do it myself, someday, well that means it will never happen so I'll leave the issue there for whomever touches the repo. Thanks for being frank @klavavej

…

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 7:58 AM Kristen Lavavej ***@***.***> wrote: @fool <https://github.com/fool> - we would consider issues for these kinds of repos if they were high priority. Since this is low priority I'm going to remove it from our board. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#19 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAN-oH5QW9WnE4ta6jH3FkbEZ9B__hPAks5vPB84gaJpZM4a-tnx> .

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in 1 year. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Thanks!

[fool]

While this is definitely long in the tooth, it is still needed - those docs are flat out wrong, so I've opted this out of the stalebot workflow.

[fool]

oh, this is kinda a dupe of #29