Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature request] Mobile data concerns about DAITA #6987

Open
4 of 10 tasks
SkewedZeppelin opened this issue Oct 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
4 of 10 tasks

[Feature request] Mobile data concerns about DAITA #6987

SkewedZeppelin opened this issue Oct 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Android Issues related to Android feature request For issues asking for new features iOS Issues related to iOS

Comments

@SkewedZeppelin
Copy link

SkewedZeppelin commented Oct 15, 2024

I have checked if others have suggested this already

  • I have checked this issue tracker to see if others have reported similar issues.

Feature description

DAITA inherently increases data used by design.
It would be nice to have both:

  • a reduced mode, like Tor does
    • if this is already done, please document it.
  • and an option to only use when on unmetered connection

Alternative solutions

The alternative is not using it entirely, but that is ungood.

Type of feature

  • Better privacy/anonymity
  • Better at circumventing censorship
  • Easier to use
  • Other

Operating System

  • Android
  • iOS
  • Windows
  • macOS
  • Linux
@SkewedZeppelin SkewedZeppelin added the feature request For issues asking for new features label Oct 15, 2024
@Pururun Pururun added Android Issues related to Android iOS Issues related to iOS labels Oct 16, 2024
@Pururun
Copy link
Contributor

Pururun commented Oct 20, 2024

Thank you for your suggestion, I have created an internal issue for it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Android Issues related to Android feature request For issues asking for new features iOS Issues related to iOS
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants