Lucky traces

[ceopeo]

What footprints can identify technology?
If this is not possible, I suggest adding a meta tag with the version of the framework.
This will help popularize the technology and track the number of websites

[jwoertink]

Nothing identifies that you're using Lucky. I'm sort of on the fence about it. It is cool for helping spread the word with a little free "marketing", but also I think it exposes the individual sites to potential security threats should any vulnerability be discovered.

I know Kemal adds a header that can be disabled X-Powered-By. Maybe that's something we could do too? It would have to be easy to disable, and very clear that it's added in.... I'd love to hear more of what the community thinks on this.

[jwoertink]

What should this look like? Do we just ship with a default humans.txt, or use a X-Powered-By header, or a meta tag?

[stephendolan]

I'd definitely prefer to not have an additional file and instead just get an X-Powered-By header that can be disabled in a config (on by default).

[ceopeo]

What should this look like? Do we just ship with a default humans.txt, or use a X-Powered-By header, or a meta tag?

Header or a Meta tag it would be convenient for me personally ; )

[robacarp]

Yeah, as much as the humans.txt initiative is neat, this is something that belongs in a header.

[watzon]

I like the idea of an X-Powered-By header that can be disabled