You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear @liangdefeng, I am happy to see the support of SCRAM-SHA-1/SCRAM-SHA-256/SCRAM-SHA-512 in this repository!
Thanks for your good job!
After:
SCRAM-SHA-1
SCRAM-SHA-256
SCRAM-SHA-512
Can you add supports of :
SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS
SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS
SCRAM-SHA-512-PLUS
SCRAM-SHA3-512
SCRAM-SHA3-512-PLUS
"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802]".
Dear @liangdefeng, I am happy to see the support of SCRAM-SHA-1/SCRAM-SHA-256/SCRAM-SHA-512 in this repository!
Thanks for your good job!
After:
Can you add supports of :
"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802]".
SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS):
SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS):
SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS):
SCRAM-SHA3-512(-PLUS):
SCRAM BIS: Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) SASL and GSS-API Mechanisms:
-PLUS variants:
IMAP:
LDAP:
HTTP:
JMAP:
2FA:
IANA:
Linked to:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: