-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Biblink terms #3
Comments
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 02:31:52AM -0700, Baptiste Cecconi wrote:
About the biblink terms, the usual convention in the web-semantics world is to have:
- capitalised terms for classes ;
- camel-case with lower case first letter for properties.
I am entirely relaxed on these syntax issues. So, if we decide we
won't do anything about bug #4, would you prepare a PR to that
effect? We'd still run it by ADS, but I don't expect they'd worry
much.
If, on the other hand, bug #4 adopts something external, it would
seem this would solve itself, right?
|
Open
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
About the biblink terms, the usual convention in the web-semantics world is to have:
Hence, I would propose to rename the terms as:
BibRef
(class)DatasetRef
(class)Relationship
(class)bibFormat
(property)anchorText
(property)cardinality
(property)cites
(property)isSupplementedBy
(property)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: