Use Microsoft.Extensins.Logging instead of an internal home brew logging

[xperiandri]

I propose rewriting the logging stack to the standard Microsoft.Extensins.Logging and ILogger class usage to be consistent and support structural logging.
Please approve if you agree.

[farlee2121]

It makes sense to me at a high level, but I don't know enough about the original motivations for using a custom logger.

[jwosty]

I would guess because Microsoft.Extensions.Logging did not exist when Expecto was first built. That, and I can definitely understand wanting to dogfood Logary. @haf is that accurate?

Regardless I also think this is a good idea. I'm usually using MEL ILogger in my own code under test anyway, so I have to use an adapter from the Expecto logger -> ILogger. If Expecto used ILogger directly, I'd be able to remove these adapters. Expecto could also use FSharp.Logf to keep the FSharp-y semantics.

[haf]

Yes, accurate.

[sonicbhoc]

Would Logary also need to implement ILogger to keep the default behavior?