Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Verification on Training Details #8

Open
lthilnklover opened this issue May 19, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Verification on Training Details #8

lthilnklover opened this issue May 19, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@lthilnklover
Copy link

lthilnklover commented May 19, 2021

Hi,

I am trying to reproduce the CIFAR-10 experiment with wide resnet. However I was only able to achieve 2.96% Test Error with SAM and 3.5% Test Error with SGD. Since I am using only 4 GPUs for training, I understand that the performance of SAM could be different. However in case of SGD, if all hyperparameters are same, I believe the performance should be similar.

I tried my best to replicate the hyperparameters mentioned in the paper. However some parameters were not so clearly stated. So it would be grateful, if you could verify my training details. Here is the hyperparameters I used for training:

learning rate : 0.1
epoch : 200 (and 400 in case of SGD)
batch size : 256
scheduler : cosine
weight decay : 0.0005
rho : 0.05
beta : 0.9
Nesterov : True

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant