Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cisco object-group ACL not generating as expected #36

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jun 30, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

Cisco object-group ACL not generating as expected #36

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jun 30, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

What steps will reproduce the problem?

1. Use the included NETWORK.net & SERVICES.svc definition files included & the 
attached policy file, test_cisco_object_group.pol.

2. Run aclgen.py on this policy file:

./aclgen.py -d def -p policies/test_cisco_object_group.pol -o output

3. Review the output file.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

I've attached the generated output file, test_cisco_object_group.acl.  It 
creates an object group for GOOGLE_DNS:

object-group ip address GOOGLE_DNS
 8.8.4.4 255.255.255.255
 8.8.8.8 255.255.255.255
exit

But when actually writing the ACL, it uses the IP addresses for the addgroup 
instead of the object group name:

 permit 17 addrgroup 0.0.0.0/0  addrgroup 8.8.4.4/32 portgroup 53-53
 permit 17 addrgroup 0.0.0.0/0  addrgroup 8.8.8.8/32 portgroup 53-53
 permit 17 addrgroup 0.0.0.0/0  addrgroup 2001:4860:4860::8844/128 portgroup 53-53
 permit 17 addrgroup 0.0.0.0/0  addrgroup 2001:4860:4860::8888/128 portgroup 53-53

It also uses a 0.0.0.0/0 address group which isn't a defined object group (I 
would expect it to just use the keyword any).

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?

SVN revision 259 on OS X 10.6.8 (Python 2.7.1).

Original issue reported on code.google.com by david.co...@gmail.com on 30 Oct 2014 at 9:23

Attachments:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant