Downloads/links, bookmarks and timespans #13
Assignees
Labels
Comments
|
The user can just remove the last part of the url... |
|
These popouts are a little hard to do. I mean the user could just reload the page. |
|
They could just grab the url from the address bar too. but it is a design
issue... if the user clicks on a button that says "embed timestream" they
may well think it is the actual timestream, not a subset. and so we need to
at least clarify what they are getting. and generally I think users would
want to embed the entire thing rather than a subset, whereas "bookmark"
would indicate they are getting a subset. There is currntly no button for
"get embed code for entire timestream". would the quickest solution to be
just have two Embed buttons? One for "embed with current timerange" and one
for "embed code for full timestream"?
|
|
If they are using an embed code its not like they are a standard user. |
|
I agree in general, but if you think about this as maintaining consistency
in the user experience, that pop up list is about bookmarking stuff and
sharing, but then we don't have anywhere for the user to get general links
like "just share or embed this whole timestream".
…On 10 Feb 2017 3:48 PM, "Gareth Dunstone" ***@***.***> wrote:
If they are using an embed code its not like they are your ordinary user.
I think in the context of embed links we can assume that people are going
to check that it works.
Its not that it would take long to do. I just dont think that its a good
idea to have 2 buttons that do slightly different, advanced tasks.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#13 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC7OxARcLwgbAcPktYKZkcSUrJMRyVfJks5ra-v_gaJpZM4L80xH>
.
|
|
There is the address bar?
…On 14 Feb 2017 10:27, "Tim Brown" ***@***.***> wrote:
I agree in general, but if you think about this as maintaining consistency
in the user experience, that pop up list is about bookmarking stuff and
sharing, but then we don't have anywhere for the user to get general links
like "just share or embed this whole timestream".
On 10 Feb 2017 3:48 PM, "Gareth Dunstone" ***@***.***>
wrote:
> If they are using an embed code its not like they are your ordinary user.
> I think in the context of embed links we can assume that people are going
> to check that it works.
> Its not that it would take long to do. I just dont think that its a good
> idea to have 2 buttons that do slightly different, advanced tasks.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#13 (comment)-
278856913>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
AC7OxARcLwgbAcPktYKZkcSUrJMRyVfJks5ra-v_gaJpZM4L80xH>
> .
>
—
You are receiving this because you were assigned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#13 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEDEeMMbXiHj3DNJWqyc-4RlUuPeWKd1ks5rcObkgaJpZM4L80xH>
.
|
|
the address bar does not provide an embed link
…--
Tim Brown
Research Fellow, Center for Plant Energy Biology
Australian National University, Research School of Biology, Canberra ACT
0200
*bit.ly/Tim_ANU <http://bit.ly/Tim_ANU>* | tim.brown@anu.edu.au
+61 0419-006-102
(m) |
Skype: *TimeScience*
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Gareth Dunstone <notifications@github.com>
wrote:
There is the address bar?
On 14 Feb 2017 10:27, "Tim Brown" ***@***.***> wrote:
> I agree in general, but if you think about this as maintaining
consistency
> in the user experience, that pop up list is about bookmarking stuff and
> sharing, but then we don't have anywhere for the user to get general
links
> like "just share or embed this whole timestream".
>
> On 10 Feb 2017 3:48 PM, "Gareth Dunstone" ***@***.***>
> wrote:
>
> > If they are using an embed code its not like they are your ordinary
user.
> > I think in the context of embed links we can assume that people are
going
> > to check that it works.
> > Its not that it would take long to do. I just dont think that its a
good
> > idea to have 2 buttons that do slightly different, advanced tasks.
> >
> > —
> > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
> > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> > <https://github.com/borevitzlab/timeplayer-9000/
issues/13#issuecomment-
> 278856913>,
> > or mute the thread
> > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
> AC7OxARcLwgbAcPktYKZkcSUrJMRyVfJks5ra-v_gaJpZM4L80xH>
> > .
> >
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were assigned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#13 (comment)-
279557499>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEDEeMMbXiHj3DNJWqyc-
4RlUuPeWKd1ks5rcObkgaJpZM4L80xH>
> .
>
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#13 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC7OxCyDIRv2GF-4P3Uyyi4H2S0CyOV2ks5rcPXzgaJpZM4L80xH>
.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Nice work. This is great. I really like the pop up and it is great we can now bookmark, share and embed time periods within a timestream.
From a user experience side I'm thinking though that if a person wants to just bookmark or get the URL for the whole timestream, they might think these buttons would do it but then get the specific timespan instead. This isn't a huge deal, but in terms of a clean user experience, can we think of a way to either tell the user their bookmark is just for the selected timespan or add a "url of whole timestream" and embed whole timestream" buttons as well? Is it hard to have buttons pop out the side of the popped up button? Like for the "embed" button, it could pop out to "embed code for current time range" and "embed code for timestream". something like that. let's discuss
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: