Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 24, 2020. It is now read-only.

Consider JSON-C instead of Atom #1

Open
acdha opened this issue Jan 13, 2011 · 1 comment
Open

Consider JSON-C instead of Atom #1

acdha opened this issue Jan 13, 2011 · 1 comment

Comments

@acdha
Copy link
Owner

acdha commented Jan 13, 2011

Currently the spec defines certain elements as Atom, which introduces a fairly complex toolchain. Google's JSON-C seems like an attractive alternative:

http://code.google.com/apis/calendar/data/2.0/developers_guide_protocol.html#JSON-C

@mgschultz
Copy link

Will the full spec be able to be handled in JSON-C or should certain elements remain in Atom format?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants