-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Results of validating PECO using OOPS and FOOPS #7
Labels
Comments
ok, these are recommendations, but I think we are mostly good to go:
|
dgarijo
added
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
enhancement
New feature or request
labels
May 6, 2023
Decisions: publisher should be the github organization TEC. |
Update on FOOPS which is now 98%
|
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
I know I should have done this before creating the release, but here we are:
1.1. Important:
1.1.1. Missing disjointness
1.1.2. Missing domain or range: these are only for the sosa properties, not for any of our properties
1.2. Minor
1.2.1. Unconnected elements: prov:Activity, prov:Entity, foaf:Organization, sosa: Result, and sosa:Sensor,
1.2.2. Missing annotations: 13 missing but all of them are the imported concepts
1.2.3. Missing explicit declaration of inverse relationshipts: 8 cases, 2 are peco: inEmissionActivityContext and hasEmissionScore. the rest are sosa and qudt relationships
1.2.4.URI contains file extension
2.1. Findable:
2.1.1. OM1: Minimum metadata: The following metadata was not found: author (we have creator)
2.1.1. FIND3: Ontology in metadata registry: Ontology not found in a public registry
2.2. Accessible
2.2.1: FIND_3_BIS: Ontology not found in a public registry (would be solved along witl 2.1.1)
2.3. Interoperable: all good
2.4. Reusable:
2.4.1 Missing recommended metadata: citation and contributor.
2.4.2. Missing detailed metadata: doi, publisher, logo, status, source, issued, backwards compatibility
2.4.3. Missing basic provenance metadata: author and contributor (same as 2.2.1, we have creator)
2.4.4. Missing detailed provenance metadata: issued, publisher
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: