You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently in the semantic model generator, it seems as if the data type is looked at to identify if a field should become a measure or dimension. if a table as IDs which can be join keys, even if they are numeric, they should be classified as dimensions so that they can be joined with other tables and no aggregations can be done on those IDs. just a nice to have to ensure that "ID" like columns should become dimensions, not measures; where the current behavior is that they do become measures.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi team.
Currently in the semantic model generator, it seems as if the data type is looked at to identify if a field should become a measure or dimension. if a table as IDs which can be join keys, even if they are numeric, they should be classified as dimensions so that they can be joined with other tables and no aggregations can be done on those IDs. just a nice to have to ensure that "ID" like columns should become dimensions, not measures; where the current behavior is that they do become measures.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: