Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implementations - SingleValueMapper - Rust + Mx #45

Closed
3 tasks done
virgil-serbanuta opened this issue Aug 26, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #80
Closed
3 tasks done

Implementations - SingleValueMapper - Rust + Mx #45

virgil-serbanuta opened this issue Aug 26, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #80
Assignees
@virgil-serbanuta
Labels
Rust-Mx

Comments

@virgil-serbanuta
Copy link
Member

virgil-serbanuta commented Aug 26, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Needed for #34

The result of a function tagged with a storage_mapper tag should be a SingleValueMapper (this is a simplification, but we only use this one). The SingleValueMapper should take a key as input and should have the following hook-based functionality:

  • get()
  • set(_)
  • set_if_empty()
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@virgil-serbanuta virgil-serbanuta

Labels
Rust-Mx
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Mx-rust framework and storage implementation Pi-Squared-Inc/rust-demo-semantics
1 participant
@virgil-serbanuta