Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

volunteers needed for reviewing PRs #97

Open
tpapp opened this issue Dec 21, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

volunteers needed for reviewing PRs #97

tpapp opened this issue Dec 21, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@tpapp
Copy link
Collaborator

tpapp commented Dec 21, 2019

I would like to aim for faster turnaround times for PRs submitted to this repository. I am always happy to review, but since I am hardly an Emacs Lisp expert, I would appreciate if others could help out.

I am not comfortable with pinging people without making sure they are OK with it. So if you have some Emacs Lisp experience and would be willing to help out, please respond here.

Please do this even if you are a maintainer already with commit access, it is unclear to me who is active from a rather long list.

@giordano
Copy link

I'm happy to be pinged

@tpapp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tpapp commented Dec 21, 2019

And just to clarify: reviews are welcome from anyone, regardless of whether it was requested on Github. So if someone is willing to help out and has the time for a review, feel free to just do it.

@tpapp tpapp pinned this issue Dec 21, 2019
@non-Jedi
Copy link
Contributor

I have a modicum of elisp experience. Feel free to ping me for reviews.

@FelipeLema
Copy link
Contributor

I maintain three packages @ melpa, all have been peer-reviewed so I got a good grip of maintainable elisp.

Feel free to ping me for reviews.

@ajhalme
Copy link
Contributor

ajhalme commented Aug 23, 2021

I don't know much about Emacs Lisp, but I'm interested in the project.

I'd be happy to take a look at a PR now and then.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants